Mancini you are gutless

'Gutless'?

Oh, behave. Toure was playing too far forward, if anything, finding himself ahead of Tevez again and again. This was in no way 'Three DMs'. The full-backs should've joined attacks more, this was where the real caution occurred - but Kolarov isn't match-fit, and I'm sure many of you were happy with Boateng and Zabaleta when you saw the teamsheet.

It wasn't a question of gutlessness, but of personnel - for all the covering and pressing that Toure did, you might as well have had Silva in there and Johnson on the wing, or Milner in the hole and DS & AJ wide.

I hope that Yaya isn't being picked on reputation & wages alone - though I really can't see Mancini deliberately sabotaging himself in such a manner.

On Yoonited - They're a shit team on paper but, as Dave says, they're more than the sum of their parts. And, once again, they're sitting second and unbeaten. They shouldn't be underestimated just yet.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
flb said:
Dave-your belittling a club that have dominated English football for near on 20 years,unfortunately they are BIG RED im afraid.

You say they arnt that good but lie second in the table?Dave they are good-in fact better than us still at this present time.Yes we do have a squad better than theres but the facts are they are extremely well drilled,still pass the ball very well,have a system the whole club at all levels use-all of which come from having a manager in place for more than five minuites (Arsenal also).

Dave you make it sound like we should be 6 points clear at the top of the table!

They have the same squad and team that lost a fourth successive title last year by one point.

We would have taken a draw against WBA and a win against the rags wouldnt we?

I'm not belittling anyone, I'm giving my opinion. And it's an opinion shared by many knowledgeable Utd fans. They perform better than they should do and have done since Ronaldo left. That's what a good manager gives you.

Take note Khaldoon.


2 good teams cancelled each other out last night Dave.

When was the last time Joe had so little to do between the sticks?

We gave them a stern test last night and Ferguson and there shitty fans know it.


Its all pointless conjecture anyway until the seasons end Dave,unfortunately for Mancini and the fans the manager has an objective to gain CL football for next season-they are the facts wether we like it or not.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
malc'scigar said:
Absolutely correct. Mancini has one goal and one goal only, to get us into the top 4.

He is a very calculating individual, he knows exactly what he needs to do to get us there and he is going to do it no matter what people on here think.

He'll open up when he thinks its a good idea, judge him in May, I am ultra confident taht we shall be at least 4th

I don't agree and it worries me that a lot of City fans talk this way.

4th is his absolute bare minimum. Even if we finish 4th there's a chance we could be dumped on our arse by some Poznan team in the qualifier. That's not a chance the Shiekh and chairman will want to take.

I'd say 3rd is his minimum target.

But behind the scenes, I believe he was told, and agreed, that the challenge was to push the front runners. All his interviews early this season, and that of the club staff, confirmed that.

But now I sense some people are happy for us to battle for 4th.

We're better than that.


No we're not and it definitely concerns me that a lot of city fans think this way.

On what grounds are we better than this? We're a work in project, 4th would be a massive achievement, do not be blinded by the money spent, building a team takes time and yes I will be extraordinarily pleased to bebattling for 4th come may
 
We're fourth in the table. We have barely had 2 weeks of our new players able to train together and were unable to field Balotelli. We played it safe against the perennial title challengers who haven't lost this season, and have scored far more goals than us. Way too early to judge our performances. We can be very pleased with our position.

More than anything, our team needs continuity of manager, so we can build a system and understanding and teamwork. I'll take Mancini's conservative approach with a new team over conceding goal after goal in the last minute and giving every opponent the belief that we are a soft touch.
 
What is also interesting is that for the last three months, every City fan on here has been going on about United being a team in decline, nowhere near as good as they were, riding their luck blah blah.

Yet, we turn up, don't create a chance against them and all of a sudden it's not down to us, it's because United are a team of world beaters. :)
 
DD said:
Project said:
And the manager is doing what is necessary to attain those results. I don't think RM gives a fuck what kind of football it takes to do so right now.

Besides - Liverpool, Chelsea, West Brom, Poznan at home, even Blackburn at home certainly wasn't boring.

5 out of 19 games being semi-entertaining is not a glowing reference.

You are right, he doesn't care but the point that grates is when we are happy to settle for a point in games that we need to be at least trying to win.

Last year he had a considerable amount of time to get us in the top four and he failed, so I really wouldn't hold any sway to the belief that his brand of football is going to fair any better this time.

It hasn't just been those 5 games though has it? I could bring Timisoira, Juve at home. Salzburg away. All good games. Wigan and Sunderland away were decent.

Yesterday and probably Newcastle were the only games I could say were "mind numbing", although at the very least the derby offered an interesting tactical battle.
 
Project said:
DD said:
5 out of 19 games being semi-entertaining is not a glowing reference.

You are right, he doesn't care but the point that grates is when we are happy to settle for a point in games that we need to be at least trying to win.

Last year he had a considerable amount of time to get us in the top four and he failed, so I really wouldn't hold any sway to the belief that his brand of football is going to fair any better this time.

It hasn't just been those 5 games though has it? I could bring Timisoira, Juve at home. Salzburg away. All good games. Wigan and Sunderland away were decent.

Yesterday and probably Newcastle were the only games I could say were "mind numbing", although at the very least the derby offered an interesting tactical battle.

I'm sorry mate but I can't agree. In comparison to the vast majority of other games I have seen on TV, our games have been bloody dire.

Wigan away is an absolute minger of a game, so if that is our idea of decent entertainment, then it just goes to show how low the level of expectation is.

I haven't seen a properly entertaining football in terms of chances, breathtaking moves at speed etc, all season
 
DD said:
What is also interesting is that for the last three months, every City fan on here has been going on about United being a team in decline, nowhere near as good as they were, riding their luck blah blah.

Yet, we turn up, don't create a chance against them and all of a sudden it's not down to us, it's because United are a team of world beaters. :)
United are on the decline. It's why we feel close to or equal to them in squad terms in double quick time.

It just so happens that you don't have to be CL winners to still be a very good side. They amassed 85 points last season and are second this season.

But of course everything in life is a zero sum game right. You're either great or shite.
 
forevercity said:
what a clown he is, we went for the win, yeah right.

makes Pearce look like Mourinho

When was the last time the scum had so few chances on goal against us ?? I certainly cant remember..This scum team although not that strong imho have mainly been together 3 plus years except that invisible pea...and were always gonna make it tough, they did and so did we..

we played better last time at coms but got beat which would you prefer ??
Dont let the fact that it was the rags get in the way of you opinion..
we had a thread on here b4 the WBA game about the next 3 games (WBA, Scum & Brum) and most were agreed that 7 points would be great, well only a win against the Brummies and we have the 7 points..

Bonnet de douche as Delboy trotter would say. :)
 
DD said:
Project said:
It hasn't just been those 5 games though has it? I could bring Timisoira, Juve at home. Salzburg away. All good games. Wigan and Sunderland away were decent.

Yesterday and probably Newcastle were the only games I could say were "mind numbing", although at the very least the derby offered an interesting tactical battle.

I'm sorry mate but I can't agree. In comparison to the vast majority of other games I have seen on TV, our games have been bloody dire.

Wigan away is an absolute minger of a game, so if that is our idea of decent entertainment, then it just goes to show how low the level of expectation is.

I haven't seen a properly entertaining football in terms of chances, breathtaking moves at speed etc, all season
The thing is, I could live with boring football if it was playing to our strengths. But it isn't, is it? With Tevez, Johnson, Silva etc in there we should be looking to get at teams, and casue them problems. We actually did that against West Brom. So why not last night? Starting with Milner instead of Johnson was an immediate statement of intent. How many times did Milner get the ball in one on one situations? Yes, the kind of situations Adam Johnson excels in.

At half time the game looked there to be won. A bolder manager would have introduced Johnson, for Milner, then.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.