gio's side step
Well-Known Member
SWP's back said:simon23 said:well that was my next sort of question/idea
will we be going with a diamond formation in midfield ala chelski?
Dont have any problem with this but when we need a plan B or C then you have to change formations sometimes and require different playes to do so...so occasionally it may be 4-5-1 or 4-3-3 or even 4-4-2......
I want to see vaiation in style of play when needed and Ive not seen this from RM....yet!!!.
It will be interesting to see if he has left himself the ability to do so with the likes of bellamy and ireland (probably) leaving
Really?? I have never seen a City manager so happy to change formations and systems mid-game as much as Mancini. He rarely plays the same one for a full 90.
Have you been watching?
He certainly has been doing it in pre-season (sometime 3 or 4 times) and did it all last season. Including in his first game against Stoke.
-- Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:01 pm --
gio's side step said:I've had 'you're a rag' more than those to date
That is because you both moan and slate City more than you appear to "support" them.
Just an observation and doesn't mean that you are not supporters. Just moany, depressing ones that hold some players (Ireland for DD and Bellamy for GST) in higher regard than the club (which will obviously annoy some other supporters hence the negative comments).
But it doesn't change the way either of you post so it will continue, whether right or fair. You are both big boys though so I wouldn't let it bother you for fucks sake ;)
What is absolutely hilariously ridiculous on your part, is how you determine or categorise 'support'. You seem to insinuate that 'support' or level of 'support' is measured by how 'you' determine something to be positive or negative on a messageboard forum. Apologies if this appears a little patronising but do you realise their are some people on here who have supported City for 4-5 years, some who don't go to a single game, some who haven't done for many years, and all they do is utter tripe about 'City are ace', 'let's wipe the arse of the owners', 'you ungrateful people should say thanks, not ask a question about Mancini'. Do you know how that comes across when you've been watching City for over 23 years, some much longer, home and away, stood protesting.
Now I am making your mistake, by creating my own category of how I determine someone's level of support. I see you said you arent suggesting we arent supporters. But your perception about our apparant lack of support replaced by some form of moaning is not appreciated. In the same way, my perceived pessimism isnt appreciated by some. I don't expect certain people to see if for what it is. Honesty. That's because those people create their entire existence and allegiance based on self deception. That's fine with me. I'll just debate things my own way.
I certainly don't hold any player in higher esteem than the club. But remember this. We are more Manchester City football club than Mancini, Bellamy and Ireland. And we have a right as fans, yes to utter tripe like 'Jo is quality' etc (hilarious) but also, pose critical questions of issues city related when we deem fit. I don't respond to everything I read on here. I don't waste my time with half of it. So offer me the same courtesy if you don't appreciate a post which only intended to highlight some shitty form of PR which was a. predictable on Cook's part, and b. not even noticed by some people who seem overly obsessed with reading ambiguous propoganda in the sun newspaper