Manuel Pellegrini (cont)

[BillyShears]

4 games 4 points, so a point a game.

Pellegrini is 2 games and 1 point, so half a point a game. In your eyes somewhat less than reasonable I assume.

I laughed.

piss funny mate - i ain't got a clue what significance it has

I'll tell you something which is significant. The Chelsea sides which City faced under Mancini, especially in his last two season in charge, were a long way away from the current Chelsea side in terms of quality. Plus there was the revolving managerial door and the uncertainty which came with AVB, Rafa, Di Matteo, etc.

Seems kinda weird the Bobby fanboys getting out their "Mancini would've won that game" posters because lets face it, his record against Mourinho is no better than Pellegrini's.

 

[schfc6]

Clown

Sorry, I just prefer players with end product. Schurrle has scored a goal in the World Cup final, Milner could not get a start for England. Seems I'm not the only one with the clown opinion. Some City fans need to face it, Milner just isn't very good.

Which World Cup final was that then?

My bad, the semi. Point still stands, I feel Schurrle to be far better than Milner and despite what people say Mourinho's working with a better squad.

 

[Etihad Dave]

Anyone who wants Pellegrini out need their head testing! He won us the league last season! Do we really want to become a Spurs or Chelsea kind of club?! Chelsea are a superb side and rightly sit top of the table, it's not like we are down in 8th place!!

 

[BillyShears]

I laughed.

piss funny mate - i ain't got a clue what significance it has

Haven't you been reading? It's concrete proof that our ex manager would have won that game, instead of stumbling towards the relegation zone and another sacking in Italy.

It's funny all the chest beating in the Mancini thread in the run up to the Chelsea match. Then Inter go and lose to Sassuolo quite comprehensively to strand them in the bottom half of the table. TBF it's unlikely they'll be relegated, but it's also unlikely that they'll be finishing in a European place.

 

[crystal_mais]

I laughed.

piss funny mate - i ain't got a clue what significance it has

I'll tell you something which is significant. The Chelsea sides which City faced under Mancini, especially in his last two season in charge, were a long way away from the current Chelsea side in terms of quality. Plus there was the revolving managerial door and the uncertainty which came with AVB, Rafa, Di Matteo, etc.

Seems kinda weird the Bobby fanboys getting out their "Mancini would've won that game" posters because lets face it, his record against Mourinho is no better than Pellegrini's.

Thats what I don't get - trying to compare using differing timescales and conditions - very odd from the so called fanboys - maybe its trying to justify their beliefs in some way - interesting

 

[chris85mcfc]

The Chelsea side which Mancini faced also won the Champions league

 

[crystal_mais]

The Chelsea side which Mancini faced also won the Champions league

Absolutely correct - but also came 3rd or 4th in Prem from what I can remember - You boys need to justify Mancini has and had a bigger dick than MP then thats your perogative - take it to a different thread.

MP has worked wonders since he has been here and bossed the peoples champions in their back yard in front of 650million viewers across the world

Forward with the boss - wait till yaya and Bony are here and then Jose won't know whats hit him

 

[aguero93:20]

The Chelsea side which Mancini faced also won the Champions league

And that side he did the league double over (Ancelotti's first season) hold the premier league record for goals scored and won the Premier League and FA cup double. But it's still irrelevant really.

 

[uwe rosler 28]

Sorry, I just prefer players with end product. Schurrle has scored a goal in the World Cup final, Milner could not get a start for England. Seems I'm not the only one with the clown opinion. Some City fans need to face it, Milner just isn't very good.

Which World Cup final was that then?

My bad, the semi. Point still stands, I feel Schurrle to be far better than Milner and despite what people say Mourinho's working with a better squad.

Don't think mourinho sees it like this or he would have put more faith in his squad players this season!

 

[chris85mcfc]

The Chelsea side which Mancini faced also won the Champions league

And that side he did the league double over (Ancelotti's first season) hold the premier league record for goals scored and won the Premier League and FA cup double. But it's still irrelevant really.

Run that by me again mate? Late night last night watching the Superbowl!

I'm not backing Mancini in this silly argument about who has a better record against Chelsea, just stating a fact that that Chelsea team won the Champions League, as some people are saying their squad wasn't as good as the one they have now.