Marc Cucurella

[samuelyeboah]

Andy Naylor at it again. Saying nothing changed and Brighton won't be bullied . Doesn't mention anything about second offer , if sent






View attachment 50894

complete article https://theathletic.com/3441955/202...rce=rss&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

it's good to know brighton are managed by 9 year old children

 

[TB369]

Everyone that seems remotely connected to brighton acts like petty kids.

 

[Cobwebcat]

If it’s true that Brighton are less likely to sell because of the initial offer and the timing of the bid, I have to admit I thought that might be the case, imagining if it were us on the receiving end.

This is a real long shot but I wonder if Pep wants Cuc but Txiki doesn’t. I think that’s what was the case with Kane.

 

[yeah whatever !!]

So he's signing on the 15th August at 3.00pm.

3.15pm would be better
15 15 15 ;)

 

[Withnail]

Reading the article not sure why Andy naylor is so bitter about this whole thing. Like a fanzine writer rather than a professional journalist.

Disappointing to read we are no nearer striking a deal however, that opening bid really was stupid

Ideally, this deal gets finalised asap, but we still have to the end of August to get a lb in. I hope we can get this transfer over the line, but if not we move on to the next target.

 

[Fordyboy46]

thing is he is their mouthpiece so i would think this is a message from Brighton in public to either get serious or bugger off!

I bet he wasn't this better when Arsenal came after White. Just because it's City, no other words needed

 

[KS55]

Reading the article not sure why Andy naylor is so bitter about this whole thing. Like a fanzine writer rather than a professional journalist.

Disappointing to read we are no nearer striking a deal however, that opening bid really was stupid

The opening bid could be interpreted as a signal to Brighton that we will not pay silly money and that while £50m is out of the question we may pay £40 m.

 

[DeBlueLou]

Andy Naylor at it again. Saying nothing changed and Brighton won't be bullied . Doesn't mention anything about second offer , if sent






View attachment 50894

complete article https://theathletic.com/3441955/202...rce=rss&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Sounds like City never made a second bid and are not close to the fee they want. :/

 

[Trickyblues]

Sounds like City never made a second bid and are not close to the fee they want. :/

Media are always a couple of days behind when it comes to transfers

 

[dachoosen1]

If it’s true that Brighton are less likely to sell because of the initial offer and the timing of the bid, I have to admit I thought that might be the case, imagining if it were us on the receiving end.

This is a real long shot but I wonder if Pep wants Cuc but Txiki doesn’t. I think that’s what was the case with Kane.

I honestly think it's just the clubs value him differently and Brighton are using the fact they bummed arsenal in the white deal that people should just give them what they want. Tagliafico has moved for €4 mil raum is/was available for around €35mil Brightons value of £50 mil is to high for an unproven player who has only one cap for Spain who are hardly spoil for choice at lb.