Mario, time to say goodbye?

Jumanji said:
EaglesFan said:
C.U.N.T.S.
What is that an acronym for?

People who jump on you personnaly for expressing your opinion on player/strategy/team/anything really...

Also known as idiots. They will find themselves within that definition instantly.

-- Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:24 pm --

salford blue 62 said:
three questions.
1) how old are you ?
2) who do you support-you are not a blue.
3) why dont you fuck off
thank you.

1) probably older than you
2) I support City, which doesnt mean I'm not entitled to have opinion on players as players, and not mass entertainers.
3) same question to you?

Any time, mate.

P.S. - pure example of the definition above (person who has not spoken to me once in his life and attacks me based on just not sharing his opinion on Balotelli).
 
A few comments formulate my own opinion really. I echo what TH has stated. I think that Mario will score some important goals between now and the end of the season but I just think he is "getting in the way". It was funny to see all the unpredictable shite he's got up to but at the end of the day we're here to win football matches and unless he matures off the field then I don't see a long-term future here in terms of the negative publicity he has drawn to the club and the amount of time Mancini dedicates to one player.
 
Jumanji said:
You support Dzeko.

So? I have opinion about each and every player on this squad (just like everyone else), Balotelli included. Majority are positive, some are negative...

Just normal stuff, you know...
 
EaglesFan said:
It was worth posting something anti-balotelli just to witness all the instant personnal attacks by "supermario" bandwagon members :-) (see "pudge" et. all)

Just goes to show the type of people who approve his behavior...bunch of insecure, teenage C.U.N.T.S. acting just like him. Getting all personnal. Internet warriors.

:-)

Now I will leave you alone with your idol.
A couple of things strike me as outstandingly idiotic about your behaviour.

1. That you think your behaviour is any less petulant than the 'bandwagon'.
2. That such is your hatred of Balotelli, you had a go at Mancini and seemed not to have noticed and then actually believe your post was simply anti-Balotelli rather than anti-Mancini. You're not wumming, that could be understood if not condoned, but you actually sincerely believe your post was just anti-Balotelli.
 
C_T_I_D said:
A few comments formulate my own opinion really. I echo what TH has stated. I think that Mario will score some important goals between now and the end of the season but I just think he is "getting in the way". It was funny to see all the unpredictable shite he's got up to but at the end of the day we're here to win football matches and unless he matures off the field then I don't see a long-term future here in terms of the negative publicity he has drawn to the club and the amount of time Mancini dedicates to one player.


But that's not what I have been trying to say, mate.

For me, he has the talent to be the best striker in the world, should he be allowed to apply himself properly over the next couple years.

However, the thread was started in the immediate aftermath of the Spuds incident.

I don't believe he will be allowed to reach his full potential in this country because of his notoriety, the agenda of refs and media, and that won't serve him or City.
 
Skashion said:
EaglesFan said:
It was worth posting something anti-balotelli just to witness all the instant personnal attacks by "supermario" bandwagon members :-) (see "pudge" et. all)

Just goes to show the type of people who approve his behavior...bunch of insecure, teenage C.U.N.T.S. acting just like him. Getting all personnal. Internet warriors.

:-)

Now I will leave you alone with your idol.
A couple of things strike me as outstandingly idiotic about your behaviour.

1. That you think your behaviour is any less petulant than the 'bandwagon'.
2. That such is your hatred of Balotelli, you had a go at Mancini and seemed not to have noticed and then actually believe your post was simply anti-Balotelli rather than anti-Mancini. You're not wumming, that could be understood if not condoned, but you actually sincerely believe your post was just anti-Balotelli.

You might have a point there. But it's not Mancini or Balotelli for that matter that I really dislike, it's their relationship which is something that I've never witnessed before in my life.

It's outright strange, and IMO does not belong in professional football.
Hope that clears it out a bit.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.