Martin Samuel on Jose/FFP

[Castiel]

Because he hasn't given his eighteen months notice yet... He probably never will, but if he does, all that exists to pay him back are Chelsea's assets.

So you can owe money and not owe money at the same time? I'm not being funny here I just assumed that meant it was written off. He converted it to shares or something.

Edit: Nevermind I understand what you mean now.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

I take serious exception to this, as I've always been arrogant.

 

[Castiel]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

Well did you take a look at that pre-match thread and all the abuse I got for simply posting a lineup and commenting on how I thought we'd would approach the game like I have every year? It was comparable to RAWK and went well beyond banter, some City fans on here had to step in to tell people to calm down. There was a lot of arrogance and I said as much on here as well. I use the same name on both sites because I have nothing to hide, but Bluemoon wasn't having a good day that day and there was plenty of egg on faces. I did defend this place on there following the game as they thought it was another RAWK, because I know that isn't true.

 

[Deleted member 58678]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

Well did you take a look at that pre-match thread and all the abuse I got for simply posting a lineup and commenting on how I thought we'd would approach the game like I have every year? It was comparable to RAWK and went well beyond banter, some City fans on here had to step in to tell people to calm down. There was a lot of arrogance and I said as much on here as well. I use the same name on both sites because I have nothing to hide, but Bluemoon wasn't having a good day that day and there was plenty of egg on faces. I did defend this place on there following the game as they thought it was another RAWK, because I know that isn't true.

There are posters on here who abuse their fellow City fans in the same way. Sometimes this place is a fucking joke, luckily there are some really decent posters who tilt the balance because their posts are worth more to the site than most of the bullshit put together.

 

[aguero93:20]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

Well did you take a look at that pre-match thread and all the abuse I got for simply posting a lineup and commenting on how I thought we'd would approach the game like I have every year? It was comparable to RAWK and went well beyond banter, some City fans on here had to step in to tell people to calm down. There was a lot of arrogance and I said as much on here as well. I use the same name on both sites because I have nothing to hide, but Bluemoon wasn't having a good day that day and there was plenty of egg on faces. I did defend this place on there following the game as they thought it was another RAWK, because I know that isn't true.

Que? apologies from me anyway, didn't say anything myself but match days things can get heated.

 

[Anonymous]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

I take serious exception to this, as I've always been arrogant.

No, no. "Y'are a ****" is what people actually say, not "y'arrogant" - need to sort your hearing GDM.

;-)

 

[jay_mcfc]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

Well did you take a look at that pre-match thread and all the abuse I got for simply posting a lineup and commenting on how I thought we'd would approach the game like I have every year? It was comparable to RAWK and went well beyond banter, some City fans on here had to step in to tell people to calm down. There was a lot of arrogance and I said as much on here as well. I use the same name on both sites because I have nothing to hide, but Bluemoon wasn't having a good day that day and there was plenty of egg on faces. I did defend this place on there following the game as they thought it was another RAWK, because I know that isn't true.

In all honesty I was one of the ones saying we'd smash Chelsea. Did I get it wrong? Yes. Did Chelsea play an almost perfect game? Yes. Would I have predicted a win with such confidence had I known Fernandinho was out? NO! My heart sank when I saw he was out. You will think missing one player is nothing because we have this amazing squad blah blah blah. We miss either of Fernandinho or Kompany and we are weakened beyond imagination, and that's not taking into account Nasri and Aguero missing.

If we played each other again this weekend and we had Fernandinho and Aguero I would again be predicting a good win for City. You and the other Chelsea fans might not like it, you might think we're being arrogant, on our own board I might add, but I see us as an unstoppable force in English football when we're on it and if you or your Chelsea mates don't like that well it's tough tbh.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

Not on here on The Shed End. Apparently we've become 'arrogant'.

Well did you take a look at that pre-match thread and all the abuse I got for simply posting a lineup and commenting on how I thought we'd would approach the game like I have every year? It was comparable to RAWK and went well beyond banter, some City fans on here had to step in to tell people to calm down. There was a lot of arrogance and I said as much on here as well. I use the same name on both sites because I have nothing to hide, but Bluemoon wasn't having a good day that day and there was plenty of egg on faces. I did defend this place on there following the game as they thought it was another RAWK, because I know that isn't true.

Fair play.

GDM, it just honesty in your case, and perfectly understandable.

 

[Balti]

anyone who thought we'd 'smash chelsea' is deluded

in saying that we probably would have won with everyone fit and, errrr, playing in their proper positions