Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
Dribble said:ThisBodicoteblue said:If Uefa and Pratini persist then what is there to stop City , PSG , and all those other " new money " clubs from setting up a new euro wide league which would attract new wealthy owners to invest in other ambitious clubs who are fed up with the sleazy stinking corrupt rule makers we now have. Can you imagine the TV revenues !
I have thought about this for a couple of years, but the problem is that the current European glamour clubs would obviously opt to stay where they are leaving a new Eurowide league to be made up of PSG, Anzhi, City, Redbull Saltzburg, Zenit, Monaco etc.
If you compare that to Real, Barca, Milan, Juve, Inter, Bayern, Rags, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ajax etc it makes the former seem like a rich man's Europa League & it doesn't take abrain surgeon to work out where advertisers & sponsors are going to put their money & which competition the fans will choose to watch.
The problem is that non of the cash rich clubs are a draw on their own, they are only a draw when collectively included with the traditional European elite.
This is absolutely true. However, things change. Is it in the interests of the "old money" clubs to allow the "new money" clubs to set up in competition against them ?
You then get involved in a bidding war for the best players and, when it comes to that, money talks. TV isn't the only source of revenue. Clearly the "old money" would have the advantage there in the short-term but, in the long-term higher wages and higher prize money funded from capital investment would attract the players and the rest would follow.
You could even open it up worldwide before the old clubs do and get th elikes of River Plate and Boca Juniors in on the plan.
There's plenty of scope there. The "old money" is fighting a rearguard action.