urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,383
murphy and sherwood are clueless wankers, firstly their nonsensical comments for the leicester game and now the penalty comments Jesus wept
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Match of the Day - 2015/16
- Thread starter malg
- Start date
murphy and sherwood are clueless wankers, firstly their nonsensical comments for the leicester game and now the penalty comments Jesus wept
What penalty comments?
They said it was a terrible decision, they said Spurs got away with one, and they didn't even say the classic "they deserved it on the balance of play" they simply said apes got lucky and they held onto the lead well.
Then they talked us up and picked us as winners still.
Some of you hear what you want to hear.
Carver
Well-Known Member
They still can't have a city commentary on the TV without mentioning that lot down Chester Rd can they?
moon
Well-Known Member
The locals are revolting
Not nice to say that about the Villa fans
Not nice to say that about the Villa fans
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
They still can't have a city commentary on the TV without mentioning that lot down Chester Rd can they?
Yeah I noticed how a disallowed Spuds goal prompted a reference to the Tony Marshall goal - tosser of a commentator
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,383
What penalty comments?
They said it was a terrible decision, they said Spurs got away with one, and they didn't even say the classic "they deserved it on the balance of play" they simply said apes got lucky and they held onto the lead well.
Then they talked us up and picked us as winners still.
Some of you hear what you want to hear.
Really? the penalty was skirted over and it was a oh well spurs got away with it shucks when though it was wrong kinda way clattenberg was not critisised at all and the anylisis lasted 5-7 mins tops
O aimt one for this agenda bollocks but even I thought they were bobbins tonight
Last edited:
Really? the penalty was skirted over and it was a oh well spurs got away with it shucks when though it was wrong kinda way clattenberg was not critisised at all and the anylisis lasted 5-7 mins tops
O aimt one for this agenda bollocks but even I thought they were bobbins tonight
How was it skirted over? Go watch it again. All 3 say it's not a penalty, they say it's blatantly not a Penalty, doesn't hit his arm and they even go on to say how the referee has just guessed and made an awful decision and it changed the game.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
I agree in the sense of those teams above him have done fantastically on smaller budgets. And all have quite rightly been given credit in the media.
Stoke are going about their business quietly though, be interesting to see where they finish come May. He almost got them to the League Cup final, and attracting players like Imbula, Shaqiri, Bojan. Fair play to them, I'm not keen on Stoke but credit has to go to Hughes for attracting them.
money attracts players to stoke nothing more nothing less
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Are you pissed up.They both agreed it was NOT a penalty and said Clattenberg gambled on something he clearly couldn`t see.Stop making bollocks up.murphy and sherwood are clueless wankers, firstly their nonsensical comments for the leicester game and now the penalty comments Jesus wept
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Oatcakes attract players to Stoke.money attracts players to stoke nothing more nothing less
Pity the award winning oatcake shop is about 100 yards from Vale Park.