You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Match Thread | Man City vs Fulham (02/09/23)
- Thread starter shadygiz
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Wanchope n me Dickov
Well-Known Member
Yep, strange performance. Lillo on his lilo in the dugout.Odd half of staccato football. We’re fortunately ahead but I’m not sure any one of ours merited higher than a 6.
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 24,576
- Team supported
- City
Not a fan by any chance ?Surprise surprise, Richard Keys calling it “scandalous”.
Not as scandalous as cheating on your cancer-stricken wife with your daughter’s mate, you fucking abhorrent ****.
jimharri
Moderator
Er; yes. Two wrongs don't make a right.Rashford one at the swamp stood
It was Fernandes, by the way.
Blueknows
Well-Known Member
Pity we didn't protest as much as Fulham did and as much scrutiny as var and Oliver just didRashford one at the swamp stood
rickmcfc
Well-Known Member
Keeper shouldn’t have stalled as the player was miles offside. He didn’t touch the ball or alter its trajectory.Surprised that wasn't disallowed. Slight pause by the goalie
Remember the derby decision last year or the year before when there was the most ridiculous offside ever, this isn’t even comparable and I don’t remember seeing the pouring outcry from the pundits when that was given
It has been beforeYeah I agree, will happily take the goal but would be fuming if that goal was given against us.
Legal Alien
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2021
- Messages
- 3,570
- Team supported
- Manchester City
We didn't really look at it first half, too many mis-placed passes.
Even though Alvarez scored, i would take him off, bring on Bernardo and move Foden inside.
I can see Nunes replacing Kovacic at some stage too.
Even though Alvarez scored, i would take him off, bring on Bernardo and move Foden inside.
I can see Nunes replacing Kovacic at some stage too.
Crooked_rain
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 5,646
- Team supported
- Man City
To be honest I don't think that should have stood like the rashford situation last season
Akanjis presence clearly affected the keepers attempt to dive
I'm OK admitting that, we're not shithouse rag fans
Akanjis presence clearly affected the keepers attempt to dive
I'm OK admitting that, we're not shithouse rag fans
No, clear goal under the laws. Akanji didn't touch the ball, he wasn't in line of sight of the goalkeeper. That is a goal all day long, and equally acceptable if it was against us.I'm amazed it's been allowed. I'd be raging if that was at the other end.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.