OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
19 Goals 34 assists over his career that spans over 425 games
Bernardo has 77/62 over similar no. Of games
Gundogan has 78/43 for around 460 games (Gundo is more clutch)
Chelsea's attack may have been shit but he is not going to post goals and assists here. We will see I maybe wrong
I appreciate the insight, and stats are stats of course, but I don’t think it’s quite that simple.
Take Gundogan for example, in many games his main role is to break up opposition possession, keep our possession, recirculate etc.
But sometimes Pep plays him in a more aggressive role that puts him forward into scoring positions / puts him at the pointy end of moves obviously worked on in training etc. and many fans think that he’s suddenly become a much better player and rave about how good he’s become - but he’s quite obviously the same brilliant players he always has been only playing a role where gets more goals and assists.
The way that a specific midfield function, as a cog doing a job in a team machine, results in much different goal and assist stats (and consequent simplistic fan excitement) can easily diminish their worth.
As a further example, if Bernardo’s playing left back then his stats will chalk up differently than when he’s playing right wing or what have you.
The widely differing roles that midfielders perform mean that goal and assist stats, while factual and inarguable, are often used to compare apples to oranges.
This isn’t a criticism btw, just an attempt to add context to the numbers is all.
Because of the above, the stat based clamour of supporters in favour of certain recruitments matter not one jot to me.
IMO if Pep and the football professionals around him decide that a player is of benefit to what they’re trying to achieve in future seasons then that’s the acid test.
Last edited: