Matheus Nunes

[I'm With Stupid]

City would've never considered him if it was not for the last week of the transfer window. And, it's exactly what actually happened. He's good but not outstanding.

We considered him before he went to Wolves, didn't we?

 

[Constantine]

Hi bird , are you fit ?

My bird is an imaginary innocent animal. Didn't you get that or you just think below the belt?

 

[Paul1970]

We considered him before he went to Wolves, didn't we?

Yes he was one of our main targets a couple of seasons ago . Make no mistake he is a very good player and if he comes he will be even better after pep has done with him but striking is not a the answer but I would imagine he knows it’s this season or never

 

[Constantine]

We considered him before he went to Wolves, didn't we?

tbh, I only remember some vague rumours after a game vs Sporting which faded quickly afterwards. That's my recollection of it. I could've missed something of course.

 

[xmusampa]

Hi bird , are you fit ?

Rubieles alert rubieles alert!

 

[blue ranger]

This forum is hilarious at times, Kane got stick for not doing enough to force the move to city. While Nunes gets stick for trying to force the move. If this was Wirz nobody would be arsed.

 

[not my fault!]

Read my previous posts, you may get some context

I read it hence me replying and quoting it…

 

[Centurions]

Judging by some of the comments it looks like the clear Wolves leak that he’s “gone on strike” has worked…. The narrative is clearly to make him out as a bad character and most of you are lapping it up. Two sides to EVERY story guys, remember that. We had a post earlier from a forum of theirs clearly stating they were breaking promises to the player.

I'm not sure why Wolves would leak that, in what way does it benefit them? They're obviously willing to sell and I can't see how it would make City up their offer.

 

[Centurions]

tbh, I only remember some vague rumours after a game vs Sporting which faded quickly afterwards. That's my recollection of it. I could've missed something of course.

So you agree that we have considered him previously?

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Seems a bit petulant to me, not sure we want another Cancello?