You did but you also appeared to side with the player and not his club.
So you think a player has a right to force a move just because he thinks his club are being unreasonable. Would it not have been better for the player to have put a sell this in his contract?
Do you think its a possibility that City are thinking about walking away as Pep is disappointed in the players attitude? We know Pep doesn't like discord in the camp.
Just offering a different possible take on things that's all.
I’m definitely more inclined to side with the player than his Club based on my general view of their behaviour - as I put in my original post.
But I don’t know the facts any more than you or any of the posters who seem so quick and eager to judge the player in this instance.
None of us know what promises were made to the player, or what conversations he and his agent have had with them re: facilitating a move.
At the risk of repeating myself again - my point is the player going on strike and City walking away, if true, are both quite extreme reactions to a negotiation.
Put together, they would certainly support the suggestion Wolves are not being reasonable in this instance.
And on your point about City walking away. This has come directly from Tolmie’s Hairdoo - and he’s suggested it’s due to a lack of faith in being able to conclude a deal on time.
So no - I don’t think it’s because Pep is disappointed with the player. There’s absolutely nothing to suggest that in any of the limited information we do have access to.
The suggestion underpinning the claim is far less fanciful than that.