Maximum Wage Law - Corbyn

[sir baconface]

Maybe he's having a laugh, trying to see how inept and stupid he can act before the party completely snaps? I hear his next announcement is to eliminate unemployment by raising the school leaving age to 42.

I'm guessing this would be retrospective?

 

[Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot]

All politicians are cunts though.

All people are cunts tbh.

 

[urban genie]

Did he say this applies to all companies or just govt and govt contractors?
Personally if its just the above it sounds fine. I'm struggling to think of any govt organisation or contractor where the boss is worth more than 20 times the lowest earners wage.
It is reassuring to see the amount of ordinary folk rushing to defend company exec pay scales though, as well as demonizing unions.

He said it would be a voluntary option for business, with a link to the amount of corporation tax then paid as an incentive to trickle down the pay scales to be more even overall, his only example was footballers earning 20m a year, whose pay is ridiculous.

A somewhat leftfield idea that was actually fawned over by the media when Cameron muted it, a 20:1 pay ratio, not a maximun wage as has been reported.

But then an idea put forward by an oposition leader that's not even a policy is more news worthy than the NHS shambles, fucked up railways and Homeless & Housing crisis that is marginalised everyday.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Can I wear my Sheikh Mansour shirt?

Have you got those stains out of it yet?

 

[The perfect fumble]

Right, so basically what you're saying is that they can, but they choose not to?

I apologise, I was wrong, you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[The perfect fumble]

Does wanking off a goat qualify as such?

Depends what the goat charged and whether it went through the books.

 

[aguero93:20]

I apologise, I was wrong, you don't know what you're talking about.

I beg to differ, you don't. The board only have their positions by virtue of the shareholders consent.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I beg to differ, you don't. The board only have their positions by virtue of the shareholders consent.

A consent that is only withdrawn in the most egregious of circumstances. The threshold is unhelpfully high.

 

[aguero93:20]

A consent that is only withdrawn in the most egregious of circumstances. The threshold is unhelpfully high.

Then they only have themselves to blame and nobody should be looking for regulation to solve the problem when the law already provides the solution.

 

[stony]