I think this thread needs renaming, because the "agenda" tag has become all encompassing and, dare I say, a bit misleading.
I think most people feel that there is a media bias against City, and that FFP is pointedly aimed at us and PSG. What some of us baulk at, however, is the notion that everyone is against us because it just doesn't ring true to me.
FFP is the big, fuck off conspiracy against our club.
The Daily Mail, as vile a publication as it is, is often cited as one of the mainstays of the agenda, yet their chief sports writer is probably the staunchest defender of City out there. The second biggest paper in the country have their main sports correspondent constantly, and vociferously, fighting our corner. Why would they do that if there is was a genuine agenda against us? Surely they would have him berating us at every opportunity.
We're getting bogged down in semantics though. Everyone interprets the word "agenda" differently.
For me, FFP is clearly an agenda against City and where we should concentrate our attention. The media bias is a bit different, and should be treated separately.
This thread should be renamed "Media bias against City", because that's a far more legitimate argument than an all encompassing "agenda" against City.
