chesterguy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,504
No just the circumstances of their pursuit of the Championship. Many neutrals wanted us to win it in 2012 for similar reasons.
So you think all clubs are treated equally?
No just the circumstances of their pursuit of the Championship. Many neutrals wanted us to win it in 2012 for similar reasons.
No just the circumstances of their pursuit of the Championship. Many neutrals wanted us to win it in 2012 for similar reasons.
+1I am confused as you have consistently mocked those who have argued that there is a media bias. Yet you have "disdain for their continual changing of headlines to fill print" why do you think they do that?
This thread used to be titled media "agenda" which like you I did not think existed. I do genuinely believe though that there is a media bias against City and for certain clubs namely United and Liverpool. Now the reasons for this I understand more clicks = more revenues the media know this and pamper to it. If anyone does not understand the different levels of clicks that Liverpool can generate than us just think why Henderson is on the front cover of FIFA with Messi.
I am not sure many think the bias is all encompassing so dont try and put words in peoples mouths. Of course not every article is going to be anti- City, not every journalist hates us, not every media outlet wants City to fail BUT the media do want to attract advertising and sponsors and to do that they want clicks
To suggest there is no media bias I believe is niaive but things will change as our support base gets bigger and we will generate the levels of clicks that matches or surpasses those of our rivals
And it is also "a business practice" to ensure that they get a more favourable coverage than us because of their bigger customer base.Do I think United receive more press than us, absolutely, and for the reasons you have stated however that to me is not bias, it is a business practice
'Agenda' and 'bias' are not mutually exclusive.I am confused as you have consistently mocked those who have argued that there is a media bias. Yet you have "disdain for their continual changing of headlines to fill print" why do you think they do that?
This thread used to be titled media "agenda" which like you I did not think existed. I do genuinely believe though that there is a media bias against City and for certain clubs namely United and Liverpool. Now the reasons for this I understand more clicks = more revenues the media know this and pamper to it. If anyone does not understand the different levels of clicks that Liverpool can generate than us just think why Henderson is on the front cover of FIFA with Messi.
I am not sure many think the bias is all encompassing so dont try and put words in peoples mouths. Of course not every article is going to be anti- City, not every journalist hates us, not every media outlet wants City to fail BUT the media do want to attract advertising and sponsors and to do that they want clicks
To suggest there is no media bias I believe is niaive but things will change as our support base gets bigger and we will generate the levels of clicks that matches or surpasses those of our rivals
So you think all clubs are treated equally?