Media bias against City

[MillionMilesAway]

Why ? perhaps his old paper told him to write biased anti city shite and his new mob allow him to report the match honestly. It is an excellent summary of the match and it covers all the key incidents. If he has changed his style of reporting you do have to ask why.

True, but he's been as per the Torygraph so far at the Indie, and the Indie does employ the laughable Herbert.

However, as you say, it may be that there's a new policy for 2016. The report yesterday was one of the more accurate reports of any game I've seen.

Or maybe Oggie just loathes Everton more!

 

[Blue Mist]

Ogden is a rag, pure and simple. He can no more bring himself to write well of us than we could of the rags. No need to look for deep conspiracies or dictates from editorial level here. You'd think as a professional journalist he'd have the objectivity to write well of us when the occasion deserves so but apparently not. So when Ogden says it was a penalty what he means is 'it's a stonewall'.

This thread is about media bias against City. it used to be called the Agenda thread or similar. I am firmly of the belief that the media do report negatively on City and I fully support the reasons given on here as to why it is done, advertising - click bait for 900 million rag fans or whatever, BUT, when someone writes an article that is not biased for City nor biased against them, it is purely a summary of the match which covers all the important points you cannot slag the fellah off.

If, as I accept he has been very anti City n his previous life, I am wondering what has caused the change.

 

[The Lightbowne Cowboy]

Our good friend Stephen Howards yet again put the boot in on City in the daily comic. Saying Pepe is taking easy way out coming to City and should avoid the gravy train and instead join Arsenal. Talk about booting someone before they've even been given the fucking job in the first place!! This guy despises our club for reasons unbeknown, but what I do know is, if I ever come across this horrible maggot ****, I will kick the shit out of him!! In a nice way of course.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

One of my uncles use to work with Madley at one of the refereeing training facilities he's not a red I know that for sure but he doesn't mind having a bet now and then. Twat probably had something on the toffees.

It wouldn't matter about a red connection - he's just dire. He just is, like too many referees that stump up to our games, incapable of officiating what happens on the pitch and deliberating an outcome that matches what is written down in the Laws of the Game.

I think we, as fans, have a right to know why he didn't give the most blatant and obvious trip you'll ever see on a football pitch. They should be made to explain why decisions are and are not given. No witch-hunt - just an explanation why! One question - Why, Mr. Madeley did you not award a penalty for the blatant trip on Navas?

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Our good friend Stephen Howards yet again put the boot in on City in the daily comic. This guy despises our club for reasons unbeknown, but what I do know is, if I ever come across this horrible maggot ****, I will kick the shit out of him!! In a nice way of course.

Possible reasons: he's a shithouse, shitehawk, RagDipperArse'ole, his team has now to compete with a very wealthy club, we are going upwards inexorably, he's a cnut, he has a very well-developed jealous streak, his most endearing characteristic is envy, he wanted a meat pie at halftime and got served a vol-au-vent!

 

[MillionMilesAway]

Our good friend Stephen Howards yet again put the boot in on City in the daily comic. Saying Pepe is taking easy way out coming to City and should avoid the gravy train and instead join Arsenal. Talk about booting someone before they've even been given the fucking job in the first place!! This guy despises our club for reasons unbeknown, but what I do know is, if I ever come across this horrible maggot ****, I will kick the shit out of him!! In a nice way of course.

Another who's had a change in stance.
He's written terribly nice things in the past, like this one.
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sco...-Its-really-hard-to-hate-Manchester-City.html

 

[moenchengladbach blau]

True, but he's been as per the Torygraph so far at the Indie, and the Indie does employ the laughable Herbert.

However, as you say, it may be that there's a new policy for 2016. The report yesterday was one of the more accurate reports of any game I've seen.

Or maybe Oggie just loathes Everton more!

His report on the Indie was his usual crap and many people criticised it, both his old 'fans' from the DT and In die readers. I like to think that he was told to tone it down, perhaps as the Indie already have the right Herbert?

 

[crazyg]

True, but he's been as per the Torygraph so far at the Indie, and the Indie does employ the laughable Herbert.

However, as you say, it may be that there's a new policy for 2016. The report yesterday was one of the more accurate reports of any game I've seen.

Or maybe Oggie just loathes Everton more!

How can he hate Everton more?

Don't forget, that's where The Chosen One came from after the GPC retired! (erm, perhaps he DOES have a valid reason, after all)

 

[Blue Mist]

I know it's pathetic, perhaps me, but the Daily Fail has once again gone out of it's way to highlight City, and almost airbrush *United* out of the headline.

Overtaking *Manchester City* and United.

Utd would have been even less obvious.

 

[Blue Mist]

ooops messed that up...........

Before anyone defends the article saying 'why put Manchester City and then Manchester Un*ted, they just put Manchester once' The article states Uniteds wage bill was higher than ours so why not put them first ?