kaz7
Well-Known Member
It's not balanced,sancho worth 100m should be a clue,the other figures are wrongYes that's why I said it's a balanced article , as it mentions it
It's not balanced,sancho worth 100m should be a clue,the other figures are wrongYes that's why I said it's a balanced article , as it mentions it
They didn't even know who Sancho was then he left us and over night became the hottest property in the world who became the poster boy for our failed academy,if he is a 100m player he would be in our first team,i'm not clicking on it but from what you say the figures are made up to sound as bad a possible
Don’t know why we are surprised. The BBC is an organisation who turned a blind eye to the likes of Jimmy Saville for years. If they can do that, emails about biased football reporting isn’t even gonna register.
The academy is doing exactly what it was designed to do. It’s basically another value stream. If it turns up the odd Foden along the way all the better.
The purpose of the academy is to develop young players for the first team squad as well as pay for itself. There won’t be many who make it because of the level of competition.
Not really a link but it was more the point that if they don’t give a toss about something that important, a few of us complaining is unlikely to have any effect. The BBC will not admit they are wrong, even if the truth is staring them in the face.I can see you’ve got a couple of Likes for this, but for me:
1) agree with the criticism of the BBC re City, and
2) agree with the criticism re Saville.
But to link the two is absolutely crackers imho.
Here we go. The Daily Fail now leading with "Manchester City's lost academy. £300 million worth of young talent deserted City".
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/index.html