Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
D0r4zK6WkAMkOSf.jpg:large


Right on cue
 
Euro - ban ...hmmm....what happened today...yes top of the league !

From what I have read in here ....3 months have passed since these leaks started and UEFA have taken no action , doubt there will be

And if they do , Khaldoon has the lawyers ready !
 
razman said:
Euro - ban ...hmmm....what happened today...yes top of the league !

From what I have read in here ....3 months have passed since these leaks started and UEFA have taken no action , doubt there will be

And if they do , Khaldoon has the lawyers ready !
Click to expand...


Media are SO transparent, you could have called it for the day when we went back to the top.
 
Fordyboy46 said:
Pep has spent more than 500m according to one of today's red tops. Is that correct?
Click to expand...

Probably , our transfer fees include wages , agents fees , car rental , house rental , Etihad flights and all meals from Just Eat., where as Sanchez was a "free" transfer , Muckytairian who cost £35m going to Arsenal and the "mercs" £505,000 a week wages are not considered.
 
glyncity said:
Today in the Spurs v Arsenal game , Harry Kane won a penalty despite being offside , Peter Walton BTs "expert analyist" argued that the ref had got it wrong this time and it shouldnt have been a penalty because Kane was offside...Clearly Walton still harbours anti City bias , even now hes a pundit , his record when reffing City games was shady bordering on corrupt ..
Click to expand...
BBC arguing the same thing, that it should be "offside" and not a penalty.
 
jimmygrimblesboots said:
Probably , our transfer fees include wages , agents fees , car rental , house rental , Etihad flights and all meals from Just Eat., where as Sanchez was a "free" transfer , Muckytairian who cost £35m going to Arsenal and the "mercs" £505,000 a week wages are not considered.
Click to expand...
Good point there, wages will probably have been included. Lol.
 
Tommy_Catons_Perm said:
I think the two schalke players were only in offside positions but not actually offside because they were not "active" or "interfering with play" or whatever the correct term is. Kane was offside because he attempted to play the ball....

Whether the Schalke players are really not active is another question though. Surely running into the penalty area when a free kick is knocked over is an attempt to play the ball?

Or something like that....I think...
Click to expand...
If that’s the case, how can you foul some one not interfering with play?
 
Tommy_Catons_Perm said:
I think the two schalke players were only in offside positions but not actually offside because they were not "active" or "interfering with play" or whatever the correct term is. Kane was offside because he attempted to play the ball....

Whether the Schalke players are really not active is another question though. Surely running into the penalty area when a free kick is knocked over is an attempt to play the ball?

Or something like that....I think...
Click to expand...
No, it was an identical situation.

When it was us, he said penalty correct, because although the player was offside when the free-kick was taken, he is only off-side when the ball arrives so foul is correct call.

Today he said should be off-side because he was off-side when the free-kick was taken. What a numpty.

He also said the linesman got caught flat footed, but the camera showed the cnut looking across the line at the 5 Spurs players that were all stood off-side.

I'm sure Humphries thinks he's a knob by the way he fires the questions at him.

It would've been good if they'd asked Walton what he thought of Kane's head butt the other day.
 
glyncity said:
After the Schalke game BTs "expert referee" analyst (their words not mine) Peter Walton claimed the Fernandinho penalty was the correct call despite 2 Schalke players being offside , stating that they couldnt be offside since they didnt play the ball ? seemed a bit strange to me since you regularly see the offside flag go up before the ball is played.
Today in the Spurs v Arsenal game , Harry Kane won a penalty despite being offside , Peter Walton BTs "expert analyist" argued that the ref had got it wrong this time and it shouldnt have been a penalty because Kane was offside...Clearly Walton still harbours anti City bias , even now hes a pundit , his record when reffing City games was shady bordering on corrupt ..
Click to expand...
I was so disappointed that the presenters didn’t compare the two decisions and Walton’s assessment of them and ask for an explanation as to why one was correct in his decision and one was incorrect based on the players being offside
 
Champions again in 2012 said:
I was so disappointed that the presenters didn’t compare the two decisions and Walton’s assessment of them and ask for an explanation as to why one was correct in his decision and one was incorrect based on the players being offside
Click to expand...
They wouldn't have embarrassed him like that. He's like a rabbit in the headlights as it is
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top