After we went1-0 up and were dominant for the next15 mins, Shalke then had a bit if the ball. Did anyone else catch Keown's comment of "Shalke are playing much better now which is what we want to see"
So if he's so programme savvy, why the low key muted "long ball and tap in" mumble for the winner? Is that just catering for the neutral. You should tell the commentators covering Liverpool and nited games.Well for a neutral and for their pogramming, a one sided game is no good, so of course they would want shalke to be in the game.
These comments from keown are not wishing us to lose, just wanting a decent game, the other lad though was a cockend wjo sounded dissappinted
Not seen someone misread a game so badly since baconface after the Sick Swan, Martin Keown, you really are one thick c*nt, can't believe this weapons grade bellend gets paid for this shit.
That is the crux of it,he's thick as pig shit.
Although,i did enjoy hearing his tone of huge disappointment when we scored the third.I suspect,and hope,that will have ruined his evening.
It won't be long until there is a series of gaffs about him a la 'Colemanballs'.After we went1-0 up and were dominant for the next15 mins, Shalke then had a bit if the ball. Did anyone else catch Keown's comment of "Shalke are playing much better now which is what we want to see"
Well for a neutral and for their pogramming, a one sided game is no good, so of course they would want shalke to be in the game.
These comments from keown are not wishing us to lose, just wanting a decent game, the other lad though was a cockend wjo sounded dissappinted
I believe that this specimen is a highly insignificant number. There are those who want City to win - us - the rest of the viewers who were temporary Schalke fans, and then the handful of 'neutrals'! It doesn't matter who we play, where we play, whenever there is a broadcast City game the commentator is clearly miffed when we score and bursting with delight when we concede. There might be a few who demonstrate fake glee when we get the upper hand but they're screaming their lungs out when Eddie lets one in, and the glorious goal from Raheem last night is labelled 'a tap in'! Just imagine the uncontrolled and unfettered delight were Raheem wearing a red shirt last night. We would have thirteen of the fourteen articles on the BBC and MEN website.
Disgraceful. Would never have happened during the mid 70s european games i grew up watching.no english club would have such open handed commentary. It was straightforward.the commentary was fully behind whichever team was playing in europe, and you,as a kid,followed suit.After we went1-0 up and were dominant for the next15 mins, Shalke then had a bit if the ball. Did anyone else catch Keown's comment of "Shalke are playing much better now which is what we want to see"
Exactly. Imagine if Rashford scores that winner from a pinpoint assist from De Gea.I believe that this specimen is a highly insignificant number. There are those who want City to win - us - the rest of the viewers who were temporary Schalke fans, and then the handful of 'neutrals'! It doesn't matter who we play, where we play, whenever there is a broadcast City game the commentator is clearly miffed when we score and bursting with delight when we concede. There might be a few who demonstrate fake glee when we get the upper hand but they're screaming their lungs out when Eddie lets one in, and the glorious goal from Raheem last night is labelled 'a tap in'! Just imagine the uncontrolled and unfettered delight were Raheem wearing a red shirt last night. We would have thirteen of the fourteen articles on the BBC and MEN website.
It won't be long until there is a series of gaffs about him a la 'Colemanballs'.
At 1-0 he was saying City are giving Schalke a footballing lesson.
Attacking so fluidly.
We concede two debatable VAR penalties and then he’s saying we haven’t moved the ball quickly enough and need to do more going forward.
Hee Hee
Bit early to be drinking.Exactly. Imagine if Rashford scores that winner from a pinpoint assist from De Gea.