Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
They don't like it up 'em.



It's very interesting how they go from "doesn't matter who the journalist is/supports/works for the story is what's important" to attacking a Twitter user for who they are and not what they linked.
 
It's very interesting how they go from "doesn't matter who the journalist is/supports/works for the story is what's important" to attacking a Twitter user for who they are and not what they linked.

Isn't it just? I note also that the he's responded to the various people asking him to answer questions about his payments from the middle east by saying he doesn't know what they are referring to. This is known as a lie, he knows perfectly well.
 
It's very interesting how they go from "doesn't matter who the journalist is/supports/works for the story is what's important" to attacking a Twitter user for who they are and not what they linked.
His responses (like from most others Rabin has called out) have been mostly deflection, as this actually is. He’s made unfounded accusations and suggested something he knows will likely never happen for legitimate reasons (debating a random none journalist who had the temerity to look beyond the surface of Harris’ work) in the hopes that they will taint Rabin’s scrutiny and the inevitable dismissal of the challenge will also see Rabin off as a source of sunlight.

This is (ironically?) a classic PR strategy, though, not particularly well executed.
 
His responses (like from most others Rabin has called out) have been mostly deflection, as this actually is. He’s made unfounded accusations and suggested something he knows will likely never happen for legitimate reasons (debating a random none journalist who had the temerity to look beyond the surface of Harris’ work) in the hopes that they will taint Rabin’s scrutiny and the inevitable dismissal of the challenge will also see Rabin off as a source of sunlight.

This is (ironically?) a classic PR strategy, though, not particularly well executed.
Probably the best thing Rabin can do is to simply ignore this obvious rhetorical tricking and simply keep publishing things that make Nick Harris and his friends look like the twats they are. He obviously hit a nerve !
 
Posted similar elsewhere but the first FFP thread on BM should be compulsory reading for all journos.
I suggest we invite him onto BM to debate facts, oops sorry, for a moment there I forget he is not fit for that purpose.
He'll be here somewhere like they all are in the shadows but wouldn't show himself, to be honest it'd be 50 posts of abuse and odd ones from members trying to engage in a serious manner it would be impossible
 
He'll be here somewhere like they all are in the shadows but wouldn't show himself, to be honest it'd be 50 posts of abuse and odd ones from members trying to engage in a serious manner it would be impossible

I could be mistaken but wasn't Nick Harris a member of this forum several years ago for a while but got seen off by more knowledgeable people than him for spouting bollocks about FFP?

Anyway, if anyone wants a laugh he's currently getting destroyed by blues on that thread of Rabin's!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.