They don't like it up 'em.
It's very interesting how they go from "doesn't matter who the journalist is/supports/works for the story is what's important" to attacking a Twitter user for who they are and not what they linked.
They don't like it up 'em.
It's very interesting how they go from "doesn't matter who the journalist is/supports/works for the story is what's important" to attacking a Twitter user for who they are and not what they linked.
They don't like it up 'em.
His responses (like from most others Rabin has called out) have been mostly deflection, as this actually is. He’s made unfounded accusations and suggested something he knows will likely never happen for legitimate reasons (debating a random none journalist who had the temerity to look beyond the surface of Harris’ work) in the hopes that they will taint Rabin’s scrutiny and the inevitable dismissal of the challenge will also see Rabin off as a source of sunlight.It's very interesting how they go from "doesn't matter who the journalist is/supports/works for the story is what's important" to attacking a Twitter user for who they are and not what they linked.
Probably the best thing Rabin can do is to simply ignore this obvious rhetorical tricking and simply keep publishing things that make Nick Harris and his friends look like the twats they are. He obviously hit a nerve !His responses (like from most others Rabin has called out) have been mostly deflection, as this actually is. He’s made unfounded accusations and suggested something he knows will likely never happen for legitimate reasons (debating a random none journalist who had the temerity to look beyond the surface of Harris’ work) in the hopes that they will taint Rabin’s scrutiny and the inevitable dismissal of the challenge will also see Rabin off as a source of sunlight.
This is (ironically?) a classic PR strategy, though, not particularly well executed.
I agree, keep up the good work Rab .Probably the best thing Rabin can do is to simply ignore this obvious rhetorical tricking and simply keep publishing things that make Nick Harris and his friends look like the twats they are. He obviously hit a nerve !
He'll be here somewhere like they all are in the shadows but wouldn't show himself, to be honest it'd be 50 posts of abuse and odd ones from members trying to engage in a serious manner it would be impossiblePosted similar elsewhere but the first FFP thread on BM should be compulsory reading for all journos.
I suggest we invite him onto BM to debate facts, oops sorry, for a moment there I forget he is not fit for that purpose.
He'll be here somewhere like they all are in the shadows but wouldn't show himself, to be honest it'd be 50 posts of abuse and odd ones from members trying to engage in a serious manner it would be impossible