Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I might sound petty but the first line on the BBC football news re: yesterdays games was that un**ed had beaten Villa to move into 6th or wherever followed by arses victory over West Ham to move into second. Well I know which result I consider to have more current relevance....
 
I might sound petty but the first line on the BBC football news re: yesterdays games was that un**ed had beaten Villa to move into 6th or wherever followed by arses victory over West Ham to move into second. Well I know which result I consider to have more current relevance....
Well they got that wrong!
 
If Villa’s front 3 weren’t the shitest I’ve seen then utd would have been on the end of a mauling. They cut them open about 6/7 times and the fact people are raving about Maguire sums up the bellends who are paid to give their opinions. He can defend balls into the box at height, he does it well tbf but anything along the ground and he’s fucking useless, he’s very fortunate the finishing touches from the Villa contingent were even more useless.
Bang on
 
It‘s not only us that know Sly Stone is a United fan boy.

As I posted yesterday, almost everyone commenting under his pathetic Villa v United article is taking the piss out of him. And most of those taking the piss aren’t City fans, they are just football fans looking to BBC United to give an unbiased headline and match report of the match.

Stone must be embarrassed this morning. The cat is well and truly out of the bag regarding his support and fawning over everything Manchester United.

Yet the Stone will rock up at the CFA, get free food and drink, and continually ask Pep inane and stupid questions that have no relevance whatsoever to the forthcoming match.

Ban the BBC licence paid Rag Shill!

Latest comments. Just a few examples of many.

View attachment 106887

I also heard their win blew the race for a CL spot wide open lol

Desperate rags in the media will never learn.
 
All this crap about how easy it is for us to dominate football when most fans actually realise the difficulty of retaining the PL. it’s Pep’s drive and unrelenting pursuit of trophies and playing his way that sets him aside from other Managers.

However, the media pass it off ass an easy task aided and abetted by cheating, using state money and having the biggest squad, all of which are incorrect of course.

How come though Emma Hayes who manages the Chav’s ladies team and is going for 5 titles in a row is lauded and revered by the same media? It’s a good achievement but why no criticism of the Chav’s ruining Ladies football with their dominance?

If any of the Redshirts were in our position the media would be waxing lyrical about their achievements and there would no absolutely no criticism, just arse licking.
Perhaps Chelsea & Emma Hayes "get away with dominating " because neither of the Red Arse-Cheek Woman's teams are that good ?
Neither of their Woman's teams have won a major trophy as they were very late in getting seriously involved with Women's football.
Amazingly, neither club were hammered for supporting their Women's teams until recently ?
Also, although neither of the Chelsea teams (male or female) have received the plaudits they should have, they also haven't received the non-stop negative media coverage that City get.
Until the government-led clamp down on Russian interests in the UK, don't think Chelsea had much negative Press coverage ?
I much prefer Chelsea and their players than the moaning Red triumvirate with their gob shite players and coaching staff...
 
Perhaps Chelsea & Emma Hayes "get away with dominating " because neither of the Red Arse-Cheek Woman's teams are that good ?
Neither of their Woman's teams have won a major trophy as they were very late in getting seriously involved with Women's football.
Amazingly, neither club were hammered for supporting their Women's teams until recently ?
Also, although neither of the Chelsea teams (male or female) have received the plaudits they should have, they also haven't received the non-stop negative media coverage that City get.
Until the government-led clamp down on Russian interests in the UK, don't think Chelsea had much negative Press coverage ?
I much prefer Chelsea and their players than the moaning Red triumvirate with their gob shite players and coaching staff...
City women going to Chelsea this Friday will be akin to our lads going down to Anfield in a few weeks.
Blatant bending of all/any of the rules to try to stop us both.
Predictable I know, but they just don't care who's watching the games they will still do it anyway
 
I might sound petty but the first line on the BBC football news re: yesterdays games was that un**ed had beaten Villa to move into 6th or wherever followed by arses victory over West Ham to move into second. Well I know which result I consider to have more current relevance....
But the BBC have never been an apostle of relevance. Their raison d'etre has become a Rag cheerleader no matter what the significance of the issue they are promoting. They are a fuckin' disgrace to the notion of journalism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.