Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I said last week that he should have been arguing against this years ago, but I do agree with the thrust of the article.

He doesn't mention United or Liverpool (or City), and the overall argument is that it's a bad thing that most of the Champions League billions have gone to just a dozen clubs - which is targeted at a group including Liverpool and United. He even suggests that the Liverpool comeback against Barcelona might be seen by some as a dramatic peak, but it's actually just a symptom of the money being concentrated in the hands of a few teams.

One of his conclusions is something that I think needs to happen if we're ever going to improve competition:

Essentially he agrees with the argument most of us on here make, that cost controls (FFP/PSR etc), just protect the already wealthy. Unless football finds a way of sharing money, rather than simply giving rich clubs more and more, we are stuck with a more predictable Champions League.

I have said for years that he has some valid concerns about where football is, as we all do. If he can get himself out the false narrative "state-owned" rabbithole he has buried himself in these last few years, he may just be worth reading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.