Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
So I’m hoping that July 2023 will be remembered for American football club owners taking over the sports washing reputation.

Fenway Liverpool FC became a Saudi Arabia shell club. The Glazer rags were prosecuted as FFP cheats and the Lewis Spurs have uncertainty about their ownership. However, there’s not much of a murmur in our media.
Not forgetting the insider trading too.

 
Here's my list of media johnnies that completely do my head in:

1 Clickbait Merchants
For goodness' sake, being a sports journalist should be one of the greatest, most fun jobs in the world. It's not about creating revenue for some behemoth of a corporation or some media mogul living on a yacht in the Mediterranean. Grow some cojones and create some meaningful, truthful football reporting or else go do some useful work to help the community, like clearing drains or emptying recycling bins..

2 Red Shirt A*se Lickers
All graduates from the school of crawling. When one of these three clubs says 'Jump' the answer isn't a questioning 'Why?' but always 'How high, sir?'. Craven lickspittles, all adherents to the view expressed to me some 15 years ago by a respected footy journalist I had correspondence with regarding his paper's false estimations of City fans anticipated behaviour ahead of the 2008 derby at Old Trafford. In his e-mail reply to my complaint, including the way the press soft-pedaled on criticism of United compared to City, he said 'If you think I or any journalist is going to take on Alex Ferguson and Man United, you've got another think coming - it would be professional suicide'. 'Lickspittles' indeed.

3 'Ethical' Herberts
The ones who stand outside the Etihad to breathlessly impart their latest 'scoop' on why City and our owners are (hint, hint..nudge, nudge) a bunch of crooks who should be given a good kicking before being thrown out of the game. A 'scoop', by the way, that always turns out to be what Private Fraser from 'Dad's Army' would describe as 'rowlocks'.. Oh and by the way (2), most of them throwing the mud have 'unusual' pasts themselves..

4 Blue Moaners
Shindler, Conn et al, who profess to have been City fans but who now disown their connections with us all, from the club ownership through the players to us supporters on the terraces. Who also refuse to accept that football has become an international game funded, yes, by immense wealth compared to yesteryear but still no different in principal from the days when Johnny Haynes became the first £100 per week (yes, that's £5200 per year..); with that principal being money begets success and is more likely to win you those trophies that will create and add to your club's 'Istry.. If you really loved the club, if it was truly in your life's blood and taken in with your mother's milk, nothing and no-one could ever break that tribal bond you claim to have had in the first place.

5 (..that's enough of lists, John.. go and have a lie down or chill out with a beer.. oh, all right then..)

The ethical herberts are the ones that do my head in. Sport is sport and should never be political. It's always been a way of escaping normal life and the history of football is full of corruption and good and bad owners and characters. The Guardian's obsession with sport being this completely fair competition based on ethics and politics is bollocks. Ultimately, almost all of their journalists just don't like City because we're stopping their teams from winning. You have idiots like Jonathan Liew claiming Haaland scoring is boring. Get out of your fucking heads guys and just enjoy the game because what you are talking about is fucking boring and there's not a person out there that isn't lining the pockets of some dodgy people indirectly just by living their lives.
 
Not forgetting the insider trading too.

But of course, this herbert at Spurs, like each and every one of us who may find ourselves in such situations, should be presumed innocent until being found guilty.

Therefore, I am sure that the media, especially here in the UK, will bear this in mind when reporting on this story, just as it has with that other, recent case involving the owner of a football club.. you know, that one with.. who is it? 'wotsisname', you know.. it's on the tip of my tongue.. the fella with the towel on his head.. lives at number 115, or is it 117? you know who I mean don't you?
 
The ethical herberts are the ones that do my head in. Sport is sport and should never be political. It's always been a way of escaping normal life and the history of football is full of corruption and good and bad owners and characters. The Guardian's obsession with sport being this completely fair competition based on ethics and politics is bollocks. Ultimately, almost all of their journalists just don't like City because we're stopping their teams from winning. You have idiots like Jonathan Liew claiming Haaland scoring is boring. Get out of your fucking heads guys and just enjoy the game because what you are talking about is fucking boring and there's not a person out there that isn't lining the pockets of some dodgy people indirectly just by living their lives.
Sportintel is just about the most condescending, pretentious and patronising turn of phrase I've ever had the misfortune of turning my eyelids up at
 
Last edited:
So I’m hoping that July 2023 will be remembered for American football club owners taking over the sports washing reputation.

Fenway Liverpool FC became a Saudi Arabia shell club. The Glazer rags were prosecuted as FFP cheats and the Lewis Spurs have uncertainty about their ownership. However, there’s not much of a murmur in our media.

Liverpool and Saudi? Have I missed something?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.