It isn’t really that negative, but it’s a bit odd, based on how he thinks his City-supporting father-in-law might be feeling after winning the treble and imagining his celebrations were a little subdued. Couldn’t he just ask him rather than making stuff up?
It’s a strange, poorly written article. I don’t really understand what point (if any) he is trying to make.
As an antidote to the modern game, with it's superleagues and multi-club ownership etc. we are constantly told by the football media that what defines a football club are the people, the fans, the community, the smile on a young lad's face as he walks up the concourse steps and sees the pitch for the first time etc. We hear it all the time about United and the glazers, Charlton and the Belgian owner, Mike Ashley and Newcastle, Bury, Notts County and all the others let down by poor owners.
For some reason though, when it comes to Manchester City, The Guardian et all seems to throw all of that out of the window and think it's perfectly acceptable to reduce the club to it's owner, and not look past that at all.
Would anyone ever write an article about if Brighton is really the same club the fans grew up supporting in the 4th tier in the 1990s?