BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
Another gobshite ex-Liverpool player.
****
Another gobshite ex-Liverpool player.
Another gobshite ex-Liverpool player.
Bernie off to Barca...So Kevin's off to pastures new, Haaland ain't winning Player of the Season, City won't be successful if they appeal (not even been punished yet), just another day in meedjaville.
Arsenal were awarded with a gold premier league trophy as well.Kind of agree with this - but its not like the invincible title hasn't ever been achieved before with PNE doing it before the PL existed.
Plus we'd still have won the league if Arse had that season at the same time as our 100 points. So as good as invincible is, its not the pinnacle.
I honestly thought it was a signing for the women's team.Not sure about the pearl necklace ;)
It's funny that they say "sold players" when speaking about nett spend, as if that was their plan.I say this all the time and it's really grating that everyone acts like they've won a PL and a UCL with a team of minimum wage players signed from the nearest Tesco.
Being 346m down does not mean you've done it on a budget. Liverpool are eating at our end of the dinner table and acting like they're getting scraps off the floor.
Also, net spend from transfer fees is not the only way a club can generate income and nobody ever claimed it was until they sold Coutinho to whatever crackhead was on the phone at Barcelona.
38 draws = invincibleThis, for me, is the argument for why our 100 points was more impressive than Arsenal’s “invincible” season.
We would have beaten them with our points total, so by the only measure that really matters, ours was a greater achievement.
That’s even ignoring that we actually conceded just 1 more goal and kept 2 more clean sheets than they did, as well, whilst winning 6 more games.
Winning 26 games and drawing 12 is not more impressive than winning 32, losing just 2, with 4 draws.
Couldn‘t agree more.****
Not this season!38 draws = invincible
Could also mean relegation.