Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
jim tolmies perm said:
Dear Mr ****
Your temerity astounds me, actually having the gall to refer to City and their fans as victims. You are a paid acolyte of the club that has sole ownership of that particular noun.
We really know about hard times and when we were down there we didn't matter because we were never a threat. Good old city, good for a laugh.
But we had the good grace and delf-depeacating sense of humour to deal with it. Unlike your mob who haven't suffered one iota in pure footballing terms . Bankrolled by a football pools company with a vested interest in the shaping of the Football League (including sponsoring a FL competition) but hey, all well and above board, not a murmur nor a whiff of impropriety.
All we ever get is the victimhood card of Hillsborough, paraded year after year without recognition that maybe , just maybe some of their fans contributed to the egregious police reaction on that day
While we're on tragedies, why is it that every year Heysel is conveniently ignored by pathetic lickspittle, click-baiting shills such as yourself?
Yes we can claim victim here, that of being denied two seasons of European football for something we had no part in.
When it comes to "nothing to see here" let me remind you of these little beauties conveniently brushed under the carpet by you and your trough merchant colleagues.
Hacking our database..a criminal act, which had we reported to the authorities would have resulted in instant demotion to the 4th tier.
Breaking FFP rules , for which there was no retrospective punishment merely on the grounds that LFC didn't qualify for Europe that season
A fraudulent tax write-off of £50m for a so called feasibility study, which was basically an exercise in watching grass grow at Stanley Park.
An almost decade long shirt sponsorship deal from an investment bank found guilty and fined heavily for laundering terrorism money, and which is once again under scrutiny for its alleged further transgressions.
Can you see where I'm coming from? Of course you can't, because journalist you are not and never have been . In my humble opinion you are but a puss riddled lesion festering on a severe outbreak of scabies
Click to expand...
I like the cut of your jib.
 
jim tolmies perm said:
Dear Mr ****
Your temerity astounds me, actually having the gall to refer to City and their fans as victims. You are a paid acolyte of the club that has sole ownership of that particular noun.
We really know about hard times and when we were down there we didn't matter because we were never a threat. Good old city, good for a laugh.
But we had the good grace and delf-depeacating sense of humour to deal with it. Unlike your mob who haven't suffered one iota in pure footballing terms . Bankrolled by a football pools company with a vested interest in the shaping of the Football League (including sponsoring a FL competition) but hey, all well and above board, not a murmur nor a whiff of impropriety.
All we ever get is the victimhood card of Hillsborough, paraded year after year without recognition that maybe , just maybe some of their fans contributed to the egregious police reaction on that day
While we're on tragedies, why is it that every year Heysel is conveniently ignored by pathetic lickspittle, click-baiting shills such as yourself?
Yes we can claim victim here, that of being denied two seasons of European football for something we had no part in.
When it comes to "nothing to see here" let me remind you of these little beauties conveniently brushed under the carpet by you and your trough merchant colleagues.
Hacking our database..a criminal act, which had we reported to the authorities would have resulted in instant demotion to the 4th tier.
Breaking FFP rules , for which there was no retrospective punishment merely on the grounds that LFC didn't qualify for Europe that season
A fraudulent tax write-off of £50m for a so called feasibility study, which was basically an exercise in watching grass grow at Stanley Park.
An almost decade long shirt sponsorship deal from an investment bank found guilty and fined heavily for laundering terrorism money, and which is once again under scrutiny for its alleged further transgressions.
Can you see where I'm coming from? Of course you can't, because journalist you are not and never have been . In my humble opinion you are but a puss riddled lesion festering on a severe outbreak of scabies
Click to expand...
Hrm. a little on the mild side for my liking!
 
spinney said:
Not forgeting they somehow dodged administration even though their bank put 2 execs on their board to ?........ administer their business !

Thry also avoided any PL or FA section for going in to administration at this time
Click to expand...
Bailed out by a loan from Barclays which was owned by the taxpayer at the time.
The very definition of being state funded.
 
Ballosteve said:
Also tried to furlough non playing staff during covid...
Click to expand...

spinney said:
Not forgeting they somehow dodged administration even though their bank put 2 execs on their board to ?........ administer their business !

Thry also avoided any PL or FA section for going in to administration at this time
Click to expand...
And they were bailed out by the RBS who were (and still are) state owned at the time. Oh the irony…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.