Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't understand why there's so much focus on what was an obvious penalty

Talk about it being "correct to the letter of the law these days" is nonsense as well. I remember us getting a penalty against Chelsea at home, for basically the same offence in 2011/12. Chatting absolute bollocks on Prime.
No such interrogation for the rags penalty at wembley
 
It’s not a contentious decision as such, everyone’s agreeing that as the law currently stands, it should be a penalty.

It’s just that everyone also agrees the law in its current state for handballs isn’t right. It’s always going to be difficult with “unnatural” positions but what they’re actually asking defenders to do with the current law is defend in an even more unnatural way.

It’s one of those where you’re happy if you get it and bloody annoyed if it goes against you.
I agree

Even before all these laws were drawn out his arms were above his shoulder therefore it's a handball

If that was for Everton a bet my whole life savings that they would scream it to be handball and a penalty


:)
 
Last edited:
It’s not a contentious decision as such, everyone’s agreeing that as the law currently stands, it should be a penalty.

It’s just that everyone also agrees the law in its current state for handballs isn’t right. It’s always going to be difficult with “unnatural” positions but what they’re actually asking defenders to do with the current law is defend in an even more unnatural way.

It’s one of those where you’re happy if you get it and bloody annoyed if it goes against you.

At what time in football history has it not been a penalty if you throw yourself in front of a shot and block the ball with your hand?

The handball rule is crap but this isn’t the example to demonstrate it.
 
Contrast and compare to the BBC United wankfest last night.

5F264E60-BF24-4C3D-84D7-31A37469A713.jpeg

Manchester City had to come from behind to beat Everton as the champions kept pace with Premier League leaders Liverpool.

By Shamoon Hafez
 
At what time in football history has it not been a penalty if you throw yourself in front of a shot and block the ball with your hand?

The handball rule is crap but this isn’t the example to demonstrate it.

All depends on where the arm is, it could be argued never. Up to 93 it was only a deliberate act of moving it that was judged a handball, then they changed it to unnatural position but that then took into account players position from the ball too.

Back in the eighties and nineties, there were loads that were deemed “ball to hand”, used to drive me mad the other way.
 
Delooney in the Independent yesterday on our treble: "City’s success was a consequence of a state project of unprecedented scale, where the club's Abu Dhabi owner has invested as much money as possible, to have the best of everything and make their superiority an inevitability." So our superiority was inevitable, because we invested to catch up with others.....what about Chelsea, United, PSG, not to mention the penny pinching Bayern Munich, Real Madrid, Barca, and Arsenal. Inevitable success over there?? This guy is the chief football writer at a national broadsheet, we've always known about his toxic bias, but we get slagged off as oversensitive conspiracy theorists. How can any (non Liverpool) fan read that and not see it for what it is .. bitterness, blind hatred and unprofessional bias. I don't mind criticism or analysis, but to suggest our achievements were inevitable, when our spending is compared to others, is just demented. He's a sad case
And I also seem to remember lots of headlines at the end of Pep's first season like 'money can't buy everything' etc!
Funny how the narrative changes!
They are so fickle and predictable!
 
2 things.

1. Scroll down too fast and too far and you might miss City’s 2 match reports.

2. On a more serious point. Isn’t it time Manchester City Football Club banned Oliver Holt and the Daily Mail from the Etihad. Read Holt’s comment under the headline.

CFB2B35A-3FB8-4B66-B35E-B154FAC060F3.jpeg
 
2 things.

1. Scroll down too fast and too far and you might miss City’s 2 match reports.

2. On a more serious point. Isn’t it time Manchester City Football Club banned Oliver Holt and the Daily Mail from the Etihad. Read Holt’s comment under the headline.

View attachment 102568
The club need to take action with this ****.

He's crossed a line there.
 
2 things.

1. Scroll down too fast and too far and you might miss City’s 2 match reports.

2. On a more serious point. Isn’t it time Manchester City Football Club banned Oliver Holt and the Daily Mail from the Etihad. Read Holt’s comment under the headline.

View attachment 102568
Plenty to say about the penalty and the coach wreckers complaining about ours being given and theirs against Arsenal being refused, but nothing about Stones being injured because of the lunatic offside rule allowing the game to continue.
 
2 things.

1. Scroll down too fast and too far and you might miss City’s 2 match reports.

2. On a more serious point. Isn’t it time Manchester City Football Club banned Oliver Holt and the Daily Mail from the Etihad. Read Holt’s comment under the headline.

View attachment 102568
Absolute disgrace that, even though it's factually true!
Got to do what we can to make this lot unwelcome now.
 
I agree

Even before all these laws were drawn out his arms were above his shoulder therefore it's a handball

If that was for Everton a bet my whole life savings that they would scream it to be handball and a penalty


:)
Iv'e never seen a game at Goodison where the home crowd weren't screaming 'HANDBALL' every five minutes, and I can't understand how they or anyone else thinks that wasn't a penalty if it stopped a possible goal, accidental or not.
 
2 things.

1. Scroll down too fast and too far and you might miss City’s 2 match reports.

2. On a more serious point. Isn’t it time Manchester City Football Club banned Oliver Holt and the Daily Mail from the Etihad. Read Holt’s comment under the headline.

View attachment 102568
The accused? Get a banner sorted -:)

The condemned would be more apt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top