Media Discussion - 2023/24

[bluealf]

100% guaranteed.
Possibly mentioned coach attacks, paving slabs, wanking in public, throwing pensioners into fountains, singing about our deceased monarch, forged tickets and parades on the anniversary of their fans bring responsible for killing 39 innocent people.
I've probably missed a few others.
European Royalty my arse.

They really are a credit to our country.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

They protect/promote/act according to their commercial interests. What's wrong with that?

But the BBC is publicly funded , their commercial interest is BBC studios , so you would expect a national public broadcaster to be independent and treat every football club equally , it clearly does not.
If they want to cancel the TV licence and continue as they are by favouring certain football clubs then that's fine , but whilst they are public funded they should be questioned regarding their motives and the reasons for their favouritism.

 

[Blueboy73]

They really are a credit to our country.

Aren't they a country in their own right?
They keep telling us that they're Scouse not English.
Usually as justification for booing the national anthem for the umpteenth time.

 

[give it to gordon]

In this day and age there is no need for a public funded media. I hate Thatcher I mean really hate Thatcher she sold everything this country had. Why the fuck didnt she stop public funding to the bbc ? She stopped it everywhere else !

 

[PPT]

Harold Shipman?

Steau Bucharest!

 

[Blueboy73]

But the BBC is publicly funded , their commercial interest is BBC studios , so you would expect a national public broadcaster to be independent and treat every football club equally , it clearly does not.
If they want to cancel the TV licence and continue as they are by favouring certain football clubs then that's fine , but whilst they are public funded they should be questioned regarding their motives and the reasons for their favouritism.

Deserves more than a like. I'm sure there are many decent people employed by the BBC but many there abuse their position and use their roles as a vehicle to push their own biased agenda knowing they can do so with complete impunity.

 

[give it to gordon]

Deserves more than a like. I'm sure there are many decent people employed by the BBC but many there abuse their position and use their roles as a vehicle to push their own biased agenda knowing they can do so with complete impunity.

Neville does it on Sky it's a problem in all the press/media

 

[urban genie]

Back to city media news talk, the same Pep coments but different slants to headline

 

[Mr Fraser]

The Mexican keeper who took free kicks was called Jose Luis Chilavert.

José Luis Chilavert - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Jorge Campos - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Blueboy73]

Neville does it on Sky it's a problem in all the press/media

He does but we have the choice as to whether we fund him or not via subscribing to Sly.
Same with the various cockroaches like Harris, Delaney etc.
I have a choice and choose not to buy their products or click on any of their articles.
I choose not to fund them and if everyone else did the same, they would have to reign it in.
You can be prosecuted for not having a TV licence if you watch live TV on any channel even if you don't watch BBC output so unless you choose to break the law, you don't have a choice.
If they weren't funded via a licence fee, it's a different conversation.
That's the point the previous poster made.