You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media Discussion - 2023/24
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
SatOnTheWall
Well-Known Member
Is hooper the ref for that one?
PPT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Feb 2021
- Messages
- 2,085
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I think the officials have to be squeaky clean this weekend. The PL and PGMOL can’t afford anymore embarrassing situations to arise right now. Everything will be done to the letter.I hope Forest will continue to attack the PSR rules and the refs too.
chances are tho huge ref payback coming in the game vs City this weekend. so experts can say ref mistakes even themselves out over a season lol.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 31,399
Decisions against us don’t get the same reaction as against other teams, likewise decisions in our favour are always criticised.I think the officials have to be squeaky clean this weekend. The PL and PGMOL can’t afford anymore embarrassing situations to arise right now. Everything will be done to the letter.
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 3,494
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
The press continue to be deliberately disengenous (posh lying) regarding VAR. Lots of us said at the start that the issue is, you have the same guys making the decisions on VAR as the same muppets making the same mistakes on the pitch.
They complain about consistency, but that in itself is consistent. The problem isn't with the technology, it's with the application of the rules ( and some rules), but the press continue to ignore it as mistakes means outrage and that generates clicks and feeds advertising. They are loving the forest shit show. They fume about Antony but ignore TAA.
They could improve referring standards and VAR decisions by having accountable and constructive feedback after every game instead of the back slapping that goes on at the moment. It's obvious from the comments Dean and the other poisoned dwarf make on Sly. The press love it all.
They complain about consistency, but that in itself is consistent. The problem isn't with the technology, it's with the application of the rules ( and some rules), but the press continue to ignore it as mistakes means outrage and that generates clicks and feeds advertising. They are loving the forest shit show. They fume about Antony but ignore TAA.
They could improve referring standards and VAR decisions by having accountable and constructive feedback after every game instead of the back slapping that goes on at the moment. It's obvious from the comments Dean and the other poisoned dwarf make on Sly. The press love it all.
TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 19,758
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Hooper will be the bastard in the middle for forest. He's already booked Reuben.Is hooper the ref for that one?
i personally think that everton v forest game smells a bit, the PL will not want everton to go down on the back of 2 separate points deductions, imo 2 of the 3 were nailed on pens, the handball, well i dont like the stupid rule, but ive seen it given, the PL will not want to see forest go down, i can see, luton, burnley and sheff united getting very strange decisions between now and the end of season.
Those comments just lump you in with the idiots that say what about City IMO.So does this mean we are fucked this weekend.
As for strange decisions I've seen Burnley and Sheff utd already take a few.
But I agree, the Premier league will be shit scared of Everton and/or Forest going down.
It's a right old shit show this season isn't it.
Last edited:
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 9,508
Those comments just lump you in with the idiots that say what about City IMO.
What you are missing is that the idiots who say "What about City?" are wrong, but we are right. I don't know why that is so difficult to understand?
I really don't think so fellaThose comments just lump you in with the idiots that say what about City IMO.
Could you be more substantive?I really don't think so fella
Last edited: