You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media discussion - 2024/25
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 4,430
- Team supported
- City
Nuclear masks for us Johnson's paint for them .Agreed, but forget the face paint.
Health & Safety don't you know.
Don't want monkey pox from them paedos !!
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
Saunders isn't qualified enough to take a breath testHe should have said "I don't think we are qualified enough to talk."
A good media PR team would have told the press that we have constantly said about not guilty and will only talk about the Brentford gameHope Pep gives these cunts both barrels today. Tell them how much they rim the cartel's back box.
Platt Lane 59
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 1,462
Am not surprised that Tebas has thrown his two-pennies worth.
It just shows how big a threat City have become to the bigger European clubs.
Doubt if they would have had such a big deal if it was the red-arse cheek clubs though...
Am not surprised that Tebas has thrown his two-pennies worth.
It just shows how big a threat City have become to the bigger European clubs.
Doubt if they would have had such a big deal if it was the red-arse cheek clubs though...
How can any other Premier League or European clubs say we are guilty.
What possible reason can a chairman of another football club come and say we are guilty before a trial?
How have they seen our books or the accounts for a start, Can Manchester City ask to see United accounts and books and then say they are cheating, it does not make sense that other clubs are claiming City are cheating
Leaked hacked files are useless and it is a crime to steal somebody's information, Also a hacker can plant fake files and adjust them, Plus all the 115 charges have been through a court (CAS) and City was cleared of any wrongdoings and Uefa and City agreed a £10million fine for not corresponding on time that's its.
That’s a first for talkshite. They think they’re experts in every field - NOTDean Saunders to Alan Brazil "I don't think we are qualified enough to talk about these charges". Correct, you couple of thick c*nts.
spacecadet
Well-Known Member
IndeedA good media PR team would have told the press that we have constantly said about not guilty and will only talk about the Brentford game
Platt Lane 59
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 1,462
In a fair-minded society, you would hope all owners/chairman would not comment on any upcoming court case.How can any other Premier League or European clubs say we are guilty.
What possible reason can a chairman of another football club come and say we are guilty before a trial?
How have they seen our books or the accounts for a start, Can Manchester City ask to see United accounts and books and then say they are cheating, it does not make sense that other clubs are claiming City are cheating
Leaked hacked files are useless and it is a crime to steal somebody's information, Also a hacker can plant fake files and adjust them, Plus all the 115 charges have been through a court (CAS) and City was cleared of any wrongdoings and Uefa and City agreed a £10million fine for not corresponding on time that's its.
However, I think the Spanish Duopoly have a more ruthless and destructive code of conduct than that of the Premier League.
Although, the more recent behaviour from Premier League clubs (e.g. Arsenal's board, not the coach or manager) in publicly berating match officials is something that I don't remember happening before...