Media discussion - 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
What did they expect from crowds at the Club World Cup? Actual countries that have quite a few million people living in them don’t fill stadiums in other continents for international tournaments, how would a club side suddenly do that?


When I saw a huge American family drag a full running buffet to their seats I knew we were in for a treat of fuckwittery.

However the tie of the day for me by some considerable distance is..

Ulsan v Mamelodi Sundowns

It's going to be a classic.
 
What did they expect from crowds at the Club World Cup? Actual countries that have quite a few million people living in them don’t fill stadiums in other continents for international tournaments, how would a club side suddenly do that?
Are the World Cup Finals group games consistently sold out?These fuckers have their minds made up already,about this tournament,and no amount of thrilling games,in front of packed stadiums,in the knockout stages,is ever going to change their view!….and we all know why!?
 
Are the World Cup Finals group games consistently sold out?These fuckers have their minds made up already,about this tournament,and no amount of thrilling games,in front of packed stadiums,in the knockout stages,is ever going to change their view!….and we all know why!?

Their beloved raggies aren’t involved, not winning the league in this country since 2013 and last winning the champions league when people still had MySpace accounts won’t get them a place in this tournament.
 
From the BBC football site a Q&A - Talk about hypocrisy. I didn't see the same level of concern 30 years ago at the outset of the Premiership and the 'closed shop' that resulted in the same clubs achieving Champions League qualification which resulted in the disparity in the 'haves and haves not'.
 
When I saw a huge American family drag a full running buffet to their seats I knew we were in for a treat of fuckwittery.

However the tie of the day for me by some considerable distance is..

Ulsan v Mamelodi Sundowns

It's going to be a classic.
One of the best games i saw last season was the national league pla off final. Oldham v Sarfend
 
From the BBC football site a Q&A - Talk about hypocrisy. I didn't see the same level of concern 30 years ago at the outset of the Premiership and the 'closed shop' that resulted in the same clubs achieving Champions League qualification which resulted in the disparity in the 'haves and haves not'.
Wouldn't be a peep out of them if it was Liverpool and United who qualified, and not City and Chelsea.

Hell they still get "solidarity payments" from uefa for supposedly making the champions league what it is today, literally guaranteeing them champions league money regardless of whether they qualify or not. Imagine if we win this thing, it takes off, and FIFA decide to do something similar for us, gifting us a nice few million. There'd not be enough chamber pots in the world to contain the Beeb's fury.

City are seen as an easy hit, a box to bash that everyone can get on board with. It's city, right? Got to be something bad there, no smoke without fire,just ignore the facts you don't like because they're probably manipulated or something. Whilst your average fan probably falls back to a position of assuming what they hear has some merit if it's on the BBC, you then get the lunatics at rival clubs who are akin to the flat earthers of this world, and when the lunatics are running the asylum outlets and pieces such as this fuel the fire.

I do hope that, if the charges go as I expect and we prevail, the thing that we can take out of it is that at least the official outlets, such as the BBC who supposedly sign up to a journalistic code or conduct, are made very well aware of what the facts are and are put on watch as to their future choices. Imo this should, if we're successful, be the message from both city and the premier league - it's done, accept the situation, be careful to speculate without fact, and stop fuelling the fire or your privileges within football will be reviewed.
 
From the BBC football site a Q&A - Talk about hypocrisy. I didn't see the same level of concern 30 years ago at the outset of the Premiership and the 'closed shop' that resulted in the same clubs achieving Champions League qualification which resulted in the disparity in the 'haves and haves not'.
Well that's why they want us out of the way. We broke up their lucrative party and that makes me so happy.
 
Wouldn't be a peep out of them if it was Liverpool and United who qualified, and not City and Chelsea.

Hell they still get "solidarity payments" from uefa for supposedly making the champions league what it is today, literally guaranteeing them champions league money regardless of whether they qualify or not. Imagine if we win this thing, it takes off, and FIFA decide to do something similar for us, gifting us a nice few million. There'd not be enough chamber pots in the world to contain the Beeb's fury.

City are seen as an easy hit, a box to bash that everyone can get on board with. It's city, right? Got to be something bad there, no smoke without fire,just ignore the facts you don't like because they're probably manipulated or something. Whilst your average fan probably falls back to a position of assuming what they hear has some merit if it's on the BBC, you then get the lunatics at rival clubs who are akin to the flat earthers of this world, and when the lunatics are running the asylum outlets and pieces such as this fuel the fire.

I do hope that, if the charges go as I expect and we prevail, the thing that we can take out of it is that at least the official outlets, such as the BBC who supposedly sign up to a journalistic code or conduct, are made very well aware of what the facts are and are put on watch as to their future choices. Imo this should, if we're successful, be the message from both city and the premier league - it's done, accept the situation, be careful to speculate without fact, and stop fuelling the fire or your privileges within football will be reviewed.
I prefer the old fashioned way. Burn the fuckin building down !
 
I recently made a Freedom of Information request to the BBC to find out how much Simon Stones jolly to the Far East cost the License payer. The BBC refused to divulge the figure. I complained to the IOC and they instructed the BBC to review their decision. Again the BBC have point blank refused. Anyone would think the BBC have something to hide.
 
I recently made a Freedom of Information request to the BBC to find out how much Simon Stones jolly to the Far East cost the License payer. The BBC refused to divulge the figure. I complained to the IOC and they instructed the BBC to review their decision. Again the BBC have point blank refused. Anyone would think the BBC have something to hide.

Its great to work for an employer you don't have to answer to or even comply with requests from regulators because you wont get the boot and in the remote case your company will get fined you don't pay it or lose your job.

Shithole needs torching.
 
I recently made a Freedom of Information request to the BBC to find out how much Simon Stones jolly to the Far East cost the License payer. The BBC refused to divulge the figure. I complained to the IOC and they instructed the BBC to review their decision. Again the BBC have point blank refused. Anyone would think the BBC have something to hide.
I don't know what it is they're trying to hide but I wish it was his nose
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top