LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
I’m hoping he/she is doing one of those gotcha posts.Touchy ****. I suspect they'll reply telling you your a yonner.
I’m hoping he/she is doing one of those gotcha posts.Touchy ****. I suspect they'll reply telling you your a yonner.
Only 3 ?If I'm not mistaken doesn't that make it 3 times now that they've been done for laundering money for dodgy organisations.
Apart from the obvious shit headline which he may not be the guilty party in that, I have to say that I found nothing derogatory or upsetting for me in his writing of the trip etc.Same. He's not the worst journalist out there.
I don't have access to their listening figures, unfortunately. As for them promoting the forum; is that their job? If it is, fair enough. I hadn't heard that. I'm assuming @Ric is okay with them using the name, otherwise he'd have got them to change it?Find me the last 5 times it promoted the forum to an audience over 100.
Tbf, Gaughan probably didn't write the headline.
Skin, or head?Apart from the obvious shit headline which he may not be the guilty party in that, I have to say that I found nothing derogatory or upsetting for me in his writing of the trip etc.
Guess its down to how thick or thin some peoples skin is Jim.
Apart from the obvious shit headline which he may not be the guilty party in that, I have to say that I found nothing derogatory or upsetting for me in his writing of the trip etc.
Guess its down to how thick or thin some peoples skin is Jim.
Spot on, not sure Gaughan has said anything wrong. It was an embarrassing, shamboic performance and the club needs to shape up if we're to win the league next season.I thought he was far too nice. The comments from the camp about how everything was great now, that the players couldn't run 5 yards last season because Lillo and Dominguez (??) didn't communicate well, that CITY ARE BACK and all that shit deserves an absolute slating for its arrogance after one good performance against a poor Juve team.
There's an arrogance amongst some of the senior players growing at City that I find extremely rag like. They don't need to work now, they expect to win without them taking it on their shoulders personally. Everybody waiting for everyone else to win the game for us. I don't know, this CWC and the player's interviews haven't made me believe they're a humble and hungry but confident group who are going to conquer the world. They remind me of United in 2014.
He's a posh southern boy who did a degree, started work at the fail and got given the City reporting job a few years ago. Not a Blue, but not the worst out there by any means.Same. He's not the worst journalist out there.
I don't have access to their listening figures, unfortunately. As for them promoting the forum; is that their job? If it is, fair enough. I hadn't heard that. I'm assuming @Ric is okay with them using the name, otherwise he'd have got them to change it?
Oh I hate Herbert. I know its a very strong word/ emotion but I truly do.PS. Like you, I remember the days when an article and a newspaper would be used to wrap up fish and chips the next day.
Herbert’s previous article and attack on City, before his latest article and attack on City, stayed at the top of the Daily United Football page for over a week.
I did add a few comments during that week. ;-)
No journalist gets to write or okay a headline, that's what subs are for!!He wrote the article, but he didn’t write the headline or OK the headline?
You don’t know that.
Neither do I.
But he’s still a twat for writing the article, and putting his name under the headline.
Compared to some of the more popular podcasts ( the Guardian is a particular shitshow), I don't mind them. It passes an hour on a thursday.We all make mistakes mate. Feel like if you're asking for prominent positions on this forum and using the brand that you didn't help build then maybe you could do a bit of cross promotion. Maybe they pay Ric a fortune? I mean, they don't and I'm being polite.
There are several podcasts of Bluemoon regular posters that aren't trying to be journalists or influencers or make themselves a media career or what have you who actually post here and talk about this place. All the way up to daily subscription stuff to some middle aged lads trying their best and wanting to find an audience.
Whenever I hear the word werewolf, I immediately think of the pleasent JennyInteresting word werewolf - older more mature and astute brethren pronounce it correctly, that is weirwolf, whereas younger people go for a wherewolf look, which is patently unacceptable
or alternatively, a scene from one of the greatest films of all timeSure, but it's more about how exactly we're "partnered". And I have strong opinions on that. I'm sure it's a perfectly good show. But if you fancy a free sub to 9320 then I'm sure as a fellow mod I can ask @BillyShears to do me a favour and sort it out. Daily content that mate.Compared to some of the more popular podcasts ( the Guardian is a particular shitshow), I don't mind them. It passes an hour on a thursday.
Half empty stadium for the opening UEFA Women's Euro game. Guarantee the BBC who seemed to have a fixation on crowds at the CWC, womt mention it
Is that what David Fairclough did for a job after he retired? Bet he'd be super at itNo journalist gets to write or okay a headline, that's what subs are for!!
Jack is a Blackpool fan.