Platt Lane 59
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 2,477
Yes, he definitely is a Trafford Tramps "sex-pest"...
Media discussion - 2025/26
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Earlyriser
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Feb 2025
- Messages
- 924
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Changed his title because it probably dawned he's not a football writer but merely an an apologist for their failures. In his latest piece he's still believes in 'the weight of the shirt' as an explanation for the failure of signings rather than they were bang average players
SatOnTheWall
Well-Known Member
Excellent. Their collective refusal to face up to their faults, led by sycophantic media, only perpetuates their shitness. The fucking red bastards.
I’ve complained again to BBC asking if every PL club have their own reporter & if not, why not. If so - asked for names of each clubs’ dedicated reporter in view of the fact I pay my licence fee & want clarification on how it’s spent.
Do the fans group have links to other clubs’ fans groups? Can’t we get them all to complain as a group?
It’s really pissing me off that rags have a dedicated reporter WHY???
Plays By Sense Of Smell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 12,024
More like Chief Shitting Bull...
cleavers
Moderator
It is, I'd love to hear why their football page currently has 3 stories about owen v rooney on it, 2 of the dullest people in the media, and there's plenty of competition there.
Protein Junkie
Well-Known Member
What about the weight in the shirt aka Shaw, Mbeumo and Casemiro ?
Guessing.
Because
When BBC United went grovelling back to Ferguson and United, United told BBC United, Ferguson would speak to BBC United again under United’s terms, which would have been, amongst other things, continued preferential treatment over all other PL clubs, and a dedicated journalist writing as much PR bullsh*t as he could about United, namely, Sly Stone.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Nothing on sky sports news yet.
Odd.
Odd.
TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 38,015
- Team supported
- Manchester City
How long until; "City lawyers buy the PL silence" appears from one of the usual suspects.
Big Joe Corrigan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 4,695
And Ella Toone, she gets more than her fair share of BBC coverage.
Platt Lane 59
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 2,477
Amazed how this very average footballer gets so much media coverage, not just with the BBC.
Another example of how playing for the Trafford Tramps, gets you preferential, even a revered level of coverage and publicity.
Tom Cleverley even got an England cap, due to him playing for those gonks...
When they fob you off, raise the differences between Stone & Hafez's X accounts.
They both describe themselves as "football reporter for BBC Sport, but Stone perpetually posts about united and their reserves etc, while Hafez's account is protected and you can't even follow it without your request being approved.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Man City and Premier League settle dispute over Associated Party Transaction rules
Manchester City and the Premier League have settled a dispute relating to the leagues Associated Party Transaction (APT) rules; legal action was separate to the one covering more than 100 charges against City for alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules; City deny the charges
Had to crowbar the 115 in. Away bless em.
Apparently nothing to do with it.
oldhamblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 3,882
It's a totally separate issue. Did they change the 115 to 130
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
keep them relevant
TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 38,015
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Cue the client journalists spinning it for the PL.
Greenandblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 377
Love the way the Guardian headline is that "Man City accept the Premier League sponsorship rules are valid', as if we just capitulated and accepted the PL were right all along....that's not what happened.
Also they refer to the fact that: "City "claimed "victory in an initial battle over APT in October, after an arbitration panel found that "certain aspects" of the rules which then stood were "discriminatory"". Minimizing our result.
They never mention that City established that the APT rules were, and I quote: "unlawful, unlawful, unlawful, unfair, unfair, unfair, unreasonable, unreasonable" under 8 different headings.
Also they refer to the fact that: "City "claimed "victory in an initial battle over APT in October, after an arbitration panel found that "certain aspects" of the rules which then stood were "discriminatory"". Minimizing our result.
They never mention that City established that the APT rules were, and I quote: "unlawful, unlawful, unlawful, unfair, unfair, unfair, unreasonable, unreasonable" under 8 different headings.
Probably not far off the mark here -as SAF has remained a big presence at the Sty until Scruffy Jim basically sacked him