Media persecution of Raheem Sterling

Why is it a stupid thing to do. In my opinion, your opinion is wrong

Because i think such a tattoo,irrespective of his alleged intention,has far too many negative connotations.He is also,whether he likes it or not,a role model for thousands of influential kids who may portray it as glorification of gun culture.

He also knew the fallout/reaction such a tattoo would receive,and while it is entirely his choice and right to do so,i believe it's unnecessary,even inflammatory.

As i intimated,it's not the best decision he's ever made.
 
better tell rhianna to have hers lasered off then,role model nonsense,he has a powerful message with it and he had it done for deeply personal reasons,as for being stalked it's awful and must stop whoever is doing it,it is very uncomfotable
 
Last edited:
why hasn't our club made a statement, ffs we just let them walk all over us, if this was utd when SAF was manager he would of banned the sun and the mail from the ground. and yet we do nothing
 
The S*n has hammered raheem ever since his transfer from the Scouse underachievers , quite sure they are trying to build bridges with the Dippers over their disgraceful Hillsborough articles with their subsequent derogatory comments about RS , but they really are wasting their time , if anyone can hold a grudge its Scousers , they have got it down to a fine art , martyrdom and self pity is a pre-requisite to be a Dipper fan.
Even the dippers are sticking up for him on RAWK. Presumably through gritted teeth.
 
He's had the tattoo for fucking age's, yet it's only being mentioned now. Just happen's to be a World Cup around the corner, so they bring it out now. They will scapegoat Raheem after the inevitable failure, given half a chance.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.