Media persecution of Raheem Sterling

[Tom_mcfc]

The England team is used as a vehicle to force the latest Utd superstar down our throats, Rashford being the latest.

If you two believe this shite then you desperately need a new sport

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

rashford offered nothing when he came on against the mighty Tunisia , he had three runs lost the ball on every occasion , (although he did win a corner) , according to the Mirror he totally changed the game , f*cking clueless journalists with an agenda . Really hope Southgate judges performances with his own eyes and takes the medias opinions with a pinch of salt ,because they just want another Rag in the team to please the 659m. Sterling was disappointing , he was showing very little ambition compared to his performances in a blue shirt , but you have to take into account Henderson and Lingard are no KDB and Merlin and the runs he makes are totally ignored by the Engerland midfield maestro's.
Raheem needs to take games by the scruff of the neck or risk the ridicule he will no doubt recieve , and if RS was to lose his place then Vardy is far more worthy of a chance than the Rag golden boy , Marcus Blindalley

 

[The blue phantom]

If you two believe this shite then you desperately need a new sport

Correct. The fuckin shit some folk type.

 

[andyhinch]

If you two believe this shite then you desperately need a new sport

Do you think anyone gives a rats arse about your opinion on this ?

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Rashford and Jizzy Shinguard were both poor last night, but Sterling is the duty scapegoat. I don't think he gives a f**k though; he's top of the League.

 

[SilverFox2]

rashford offered nothing when he came on against the mighty Tunisia , he had three runs lost the ball on every occasion , (although he did win a corner) , according to the Mirror he totally changed the game , f*cking clueless journalists with an agenda . Really hope Southgate judges performances with his own eyes and takes the medias opinions with a pinch of salt ,because they just want another Rag in the team to please the 659m. Sterling was disappointing , he was showing very little ambition compared to his performances in a blue shirt , but you have to take into account Henderson and Lingard are no KDB and Merlin and the runs he makes are totally ignored by the Engerland midfield maestro's.
Raheem needs to take games by the scruff of the neck or risk the ridicule he will no doubt recieve , and if RS was to lose his place then Vardy is far more worthy of a chance than the Rag golden boy , Marcus Blindalley

Surely they are reporting the game in the way that it sells their product ?
Yesterday was great for sales, RS had a genuine bad game and Rash and Ling can have their performances enhanced as per usual to feed the wishes of their paying public.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Surely they are reporting the game in the way that it sells their product ?
Yesterday was great for sales, RS had a genuine bad game and Rash and Ling can have their performances enhanced as per usual to feed the wishes of their paying public.

I am not buying that :)

 

[SilverFox2]

I am not buying that :)

I like that, pity is that there are millions of brain washed England supporters who will actually buy it.

 

[urban genie]

3 questions regarding sterling last are all that need answering.

1. Did sterling have a great game last night?

2. Was he the worst player performance of the night on chances missed?

3. Should he be singled out above others who underperformed in the headlines and analysis?

All 3 questions answer should be no if the coverage was fair unfortunately Q3 is a yes to most england fans and media.

And that is why it's a pisstake, he wasn't great,no one is claiming he was, but wasn't the worst, yet has been again sigled out.

Anyone defending this treatment of singling him out is in the wrong imho.

 

[SilverFox2]

3 questions regarding sterling last are all that need answering.

1. Did sterling have a great game last night?

2. Was he the worst player performance of the night on chances missed?

3. Should he be singled out above others who underperformed in the headlines and analysis?

All 3 questions answer should be no if the coverage was fair unfortunately Q3 is a yes to most england fans and media.

And that us why it's a pisstake, he wasn't great,no one is claiming he was, but wasn't the worst, ywt has been again sigled out.

Anyone defending this treatment of singling him out is in the wrong imho.

Thats the problem of course, since when has the truth been more important than a good story to those who make their money feeding skewed views of news to their researched customer base ?