That's an interesting theory. City have very deep pockets and I really do wonder why we are not more proactive legally with some of the most damaging false allegations against our club. There have been plenty of libellous articles against individuals (not just the players). After eight years the passive PR approach has not really worked for us.Good point but I'm beginning to wonder if our owners are happy to use us as a sort of lightning rod to deflect any unwanted attention away from them. Perhaps there's a tacit agreement that City is fair game but Abu Dhabi and any individual associated with it isn't.
Some 'don't give a toss merchants' are missing the point here. If they don't think media negativity affects our player recruitment that is. Sign for City - get a load of abuse in the media, get heckled at matches - NEVER get player or manager of year, NEVER get in team of the year etc etc. Always get negative coverage of your England performance even when playing well. Etc etc.
If you really don't think any of that matters then you are on the Rags side.
You little Diablo.Haha you twat. In my defence I was in transit.
Journalism has been dead for years, blame the slow decay of western society with the emphasis being placed on chasing money instead of education/information.
Fucking hell. If all the made up shit we have to put up with isn't bad enough, now some of the press twats are linking us with Johnny Evans. That's definitely one step too far and the club now need to act now
Just taken my diazapem.Perhaps I should share them with my Blue Moon friends.
Fucking hell. If all the made up shit we have to put up with isn't bad enough, now some of the press twats are linking us with Johnny Evans. That's definitely one step too far and the club now need to act now
Without the sugar coating. ;)Diazepam? Is that anything like marzipan?