Ha. I’ve just checked into the BBC main football page website. The glaring omission is pitiful. Christ if this lot were in charge of WW2 propaganda and it suited their agenda they would be rooting for plucky old Hitler.Funny how he and many other RAGS gained employment at the BBC soon after Woody outsourced the RAGS on-line operation to India.
Ha. I’ve just checked into the BBC main football page website. The glaring omission is pitiful. Christ if this lot were in charge of WW2 propaganda and it suited their agenda they would be rooting for plucky old Hitler.
The better you are the luckier you get.They really are hurting. Some daft twat on sky now saying both Citys goals were fortunate and our second half display was way over blown in how good we were. No idea who she is, but the pain is so clear for all to see.
No.Is it worth complaining to the shitty BBC about there abysmal coverage of MCFC?
Exactly the same script on talksport almost to the letter.
Had to pick daughter up at one, so thought I'd see if I could find t/sport channel people go on about, as luck had it " coming up city v psg" thought this will do for me.
As I said same points about luck goals and second half over blown.
Brought in a city fan to argue the case but I had given up just as they taunted him.
Back to Radio 2, can't be bothering with the childish nonsense.
People should be prepared for more of this.
As the dust settles, there will become a creeping narrative that actually for all of the possession and fancy play, we didn't create much and only scored 2 rather fortunate goals. The big thing being ignored is that it's pretty obvious City took their foot off the gas to kill the game after going 2-1 up after 70 minutes, but ignoring things with City is a must these days.
We'll still be getting plenty of praise from many angles, but be weary of this new critique that'll emerge.
Now down to the 15th article on the BBC even basketball above us ...