Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry but this isn't the case because they are not concerned in the slightest in justifying anything or anybody. Their sole concern is to criticise City and anything connected with City. The truth isn't any concern of theirs either - if the truth won't provide any grounds for criticism lies will do just as well and they don't have to feel embarrassed at all about a good dose of hypocrisy. Liverpool go to Dubai for warm weather training? Arsenal get revenue from Dubai? United from a Saudi Bank, Aeroflot? Bugger that, they'll just keep quiet on that. The aim is to put the boot into City not to give a damn about human rights, fairness or any of that crap. Don't mention anything that shows the rags or dipperpool in a negative light: if they don't mention any of that, no-one else will ask any awkward questions.
Good post as usual.

Keeping people employed who are paid to lie by rising to the click bait makes no sense to me.
Every lie has a double effect by getting encouraging replies from our enemies and unbelievably denial replies from blues.

Even the writers don't believe their fiction so laugh at their attempts to make a living by disguising fiction as journalism.
 
In order to separate individual and state, the owner, Mansour himself, must be more visible at the stadium.
Maybe he will be at the chumps league final, but that should only be the start.
Regular visits to the games is what is needed.
Until that happens our ownership will be perceived as government state, by proxy. No matter what the reality is.
Good idea, but he is a royal and as such is liable to all sorts of protocols. It's like Liz nipping down to Loftus Rd to watch QPR on a Tuesday night. It cant happen.
 
As I say, different rules apply between a high class sport like horse racing, and a working class sport like football.
Did you actually think about what you were posting?

In the real world, ownership of an asset is ownership of an asset. Your car doesn't stop being your car if you aren't posh enough.

You are seeking to justify the double standards of those hostile members of a media that treats the ownership in a personal capacity of an asset by one member of a royal family in one way, and another member of a different royal family in another way. There is no difference between the two cases, none at all.

The 'different rules' you mention don't actually exist outside your own head.
 
Sorry but this is nonsense. IF Sheikh Mansour wanted to come to a game all he'd need to do is pick up the phone call 0161 676 7770 and he'd have a crack team of security experts on site within minutes
Yes but unfortunately 4 years ago he made the mistake of ringing the ticket office, after he had been on hold for 25 minutes he sacked it off and hasn't renewed his Cityzens card since
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.