Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
I liked his 4am drunken Twitter rants. I always envisioned him fumbling for his phone as he awoke with a raging hangover, marinating beneath a piss-soaked Liverpool duvet in a spare bedroom festooned with images of Klopp, like an even more hellish version of Alan Partridge’s superfan/stalker Ged.
No wonder it took the Independent more than a week to edit a bare faced lie/glaring factual inaccuracy (take your pick) in the very first paragraph of his hilarious reaction to the CAS decision. It probably took that long to sober him up.

View attachment 8185
I bet like Ged he's got a tattoo of someone's head covering his front torso, probably Bingo or based on his hilarious tweets maybe Steve Nicol.
 
Haha. I can't get enough of Tony Evo's nonsense. A shining example of why the drugs don't aways work.
of all the things that have been levelled at city since the takeover, the claim that city have no history is the most bizarre. Even if you have absolutely no knowledge of the english game (which most of these cunts haven't), a quick google would soon show that city have actually been established a while and have quite a rich history
 
As they do very little in the line of investigatory journalism, it should be a very simple gig to be part of the sport, enjoy all the free sh1t that comes your way and provide a balanced view on things without playing to the gallery...........
Recently a number of the reporters and commentators of the past have been mentioned and they all seemed to regard it as their professional duty not to favour their own teams.
Now it seems to be compulsory to support teams openly and to deride their rivals.
 
of all the things that have been levelled at city since the takeover, the claim that city have no history is the most bizarre. Even if you have absolutely no knowledge of the english game (which most of these cunts haven't), a quick google would soon show that city have actually been established a while and have quite a rich history

United and Liverpool fans almost universally fail to understand the difference between ancient trophy wins and history.
 
of all the things that have been levelled at city since the takeover, the claim that city have no history is the most bizarre. Even if you have absolutely no knowledge of the english game (which most of these cunts haven't), a quick google would soon show that city have actually been established a while and have quite a rich history
The "no history" and the "empty seats" bollocks (City had fewer and a lower percentage of empty or unsold seats than the Rags and the Dippers pre lockdown) is why so many blues get wound up and challenge these tossers as they're factually inaccurate or in some cases outright lies.
It's either a deliberate ploy to wind fans up or it's a basic failure to fact check, either way it's piss poor "journalism"

It used to be stuff like "35 years", "you can't buy success", "You'll always be second best to Ushited" and branding all our players as "mercenaries"
As we've been the most successful club in the country for a decade, haven't broken the British transfer record for over 12 years and have a lower wage bill than their 2 darlings, they can't use these anymore so they're desperately scraping the barrel and in some cases questioning the loyalty of the fans.

The club clearly doesn't think it's worth giving these wankers the time of day by responding and these no marks seem to think that this gives them the green light to spread more lies.
Twats like Nob Harris have come out with statements implying as much.
Guess what Nob (we know you lurk on here), you're not worth the clubs effort but the fans will call you out when you spout your inaccurate bile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.