Media Thread 2020/21

[Onholiday(somemightsay)]

DROP THE MIKE....

Those stats are peett damning.........

 

[remember arthur mann]

I’m gutted to see this old chestnut regurgitated. Our owners have done nothing but good things for our club; for Manchester and for football in general.

I’ve emailed the club to ask why such articles continually go unchallenged

It might help if we all asked the club to explain. I know we can’t sue every paper as it would be an endless task but enough is enough

You have to get past the rag run City Admin Dept !

 

[eyalluvitt]

So the media narrative is Liverpool were excellent today but unluckily just ran into the club equivalent of the all conquering 1970 Brazilian World Cup winners.

 

[old get]

Murphy kind of threw us a crumb by uttering something I genuinely didn't know. That two of his uncles played for City - the Futcher brothers. I hope they both disowned the **** years ago.

David Maddox of the Sunday Espresso has a headline today which states that City's ownership "comes under scrutiny" as a result of a survey undertaken my some no-marks of whom I hadn't previously heard.
Amongst other things, according to the survey 27% of respondents stated that individuals with links to repressive regimes should be banned from club ownership. Yet 34% wanted an end to leveraged takeovers such as that which took place with a local team.

Headline:
"Premier League has 'woeful' levels of trust as Man City ownership is questioned"

How the fuck do these shitehawks get this bollocks past an editor?

What is the more impressive achievement in journalism, having been the political editor of the Daily Star or the current political editor of the Express.

Both newspapers are directionless rags run on the backs of freelancers and interns and clapped out old journalists with no where else to go. Maddock is a old fleet street fool who normally spends his time fawning over beyond their time right wing politicians.

The reason that this report is highlighted in the politics section is is that the gormless buffoon is also a member of the swivel eyed branch of scribbles for dipperdom

 

[Blue Mist]

So the media narrative is Liverpool were excellent today but unluckily just ran into the club equivalent of the all conquering 1970 Brazilian World Cup winners.

No, totally wrong, they were equal to the equivilant of the Brazil 1970 team but they came up against a player bought from Melchester Rovers called Roy Ofthe.
(Ask yer dad)

 

[LucahArchie10]

David Maddox of the Sunday Espresso has a headline today which states that City's ownership "comes under scrutiny" as a result of a survey undertaken my some no-marks of whom I hadn't previously heard.
Amongst other things, according to the survey 27% of respondents stated that individuals with links to repressive regimes should be banned from club ownership. Yet 34% wanted an end to leveraged takeovers such as that which took place with a local team.

Headline:
"Premier League has 'woeful' levels of trust as Man City ownership is questioned"

How the fuck do these shitehawks get this bollocks past an editor?

I have just read that what a cnut that Maddox is

Isn't it funny about this time every year just to start & upset City the billshit reporting & full on negative PR stunts come out

How is this twat allowed to report this cock & bull naming our owner & his family

Surely this can be taken to the cleaners what a complete cnut..

 

[LongsightM13]

I’m gutted to see this old chestnut regurgitated. Our owners have done nothing but good things for our club; for Manchester and for football in general.

I’ve emailed the club to ask why such articles continually go unchallenged

It might help if we all asked the club to explain. I know we can’t sue every paper as it would be an endless task but enough is enoug

David Maddox of the Sunday Espresso has a headline today which states that City's ownership "comes under scrutiny" as a result of a survey undertaken my some no-marks of whom I hadn't previously heard.
Amongst other things, according to the survey 27% of respondents stated that individuals with links to repressive regimes should be banned from club ownership. Yet 34% wanted an end to leveraged takeovers such as that which took place with a local team.

Headline:
"Premier League has 'woeful' levels of trust as Man City ownership is questioned"

How the fuck do these shitehawks get this bollocks past an editor?

Hahaha I called it last week, I knew that as soon as we are on the rise again the usual suspects would crawl out from under their rocks with their usual shite.
Edit: Different scumbag with a similar name

 

[Franny's toilet roll]

No, totally wrong, they were equal to the equivilant of the Brazil 1970 team but they came up against a player bought from Melchester Rovers called Roy Ofthe.
(Ask yer dad)

and a second half substitution that saw Melchester introduce their young starlet winger Raven

 

[old get]

Hahaha I called it last week, I knew that as soon as we are on the rise again the usual suspects would crawl out from under their rocks with their usual shite.
Maddock is little more than a Liverpool FC press officer planted in the Mirror’s offices. Transparent as fuck

Different Maddocks but both equally loathsome

 

[LongsightM13]

Different Maddocks but both equally loathsome

Haha just looked and you're right. How can one company (Reach Plc) employ two City haters with almost identical names? Are they cloning these twats in a lab somewhere in the sewers of Canary Wharf?
That FERW ‘organisation’ is a rabble of nobodies who want to be somebodies and who have previous for this, the only way anybody has ever heard of them is when they slag City off. They know what sells