Media Thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shirley said:
The bbc football are now headlining the 2-5.

It’s getting the attention!
Click to expand...
That's why they do it, for attention. If they put what they really think, maybe 2-1, nobody would bat an eyelid.

What makes me laugh is we all know why they do it but some people on here put a link up to the attention seekers to help them along, and then moan about it.
 
Fuck me martin how does the scouse semen taste after that particular throat tickle?

disgusting over the top romancing of an above average team pushed further by all and sundry, praising a turning maniac as someone who’s added to English football, he’s done nothing that Wimbledon didn’t do. Maybe involved the fullbacks more?

I suppose he has to be nice and keep the frothing unwashed scouse rabble on side so he doesn’t get run out of town like the last guy.
 
TheThirdDeano said:
Fuck me martin how does the scouse semen taste after that particular throat tickle?

disgusting over the top romancing of an above average team pushed further by all and sundry, praising a turning maniac as someone who’s added to English football, he’s done nothing that Wimbledon didn’t do. Maybe involved the fullbacks more?

I suppose he has to be nice and keep the frothing unwashed scouse rabble on side so he doesn’t get run out of town like the last guy.
Click to expand...
they all ignore the VAR, hacking, cheating, greedy bastards that Liverpool are.
 
TheThirdDeano said:
Fuck me martin how does the scouse semen taste after that particular throat tickle?

disgusting over the top romancing of an above average team pushed further by all and sundry, praising a turning maniac as someone who’s added to English football, he’s done nothing that Wimbledon didn’t do. Maybe involved the fullbacks more?

I suppose he has to be nice and keep the frothing unwashed scouse rabble on side so he doesn’t get run out of town like the last guy.
Click to expand...

An above average team, done nothing that Wimbledon didn’t do.

You might get a few likes but its just ridiculous if you actually believe that. Just complete utter bias.
 
franksinatra said:
I do not defend the media at all, but again I can see with your bias why you might think that.
Click to expand...
You’re absolutely right, I have a bias against the media, I worked in it for a while, I saw what it did.
I do not forget what I learnt there and I see it now in practice, despicable tools of propaganda and mass manipulation.

I was going to say, show me a newspaper without vested interest or an agenda and I’ll defend them for publish; but that’s not what the news is for: it’s for printing sheer fact.

the day you disagree or agree with a news story is when the media is dead.
 
FootballSense said:
Samuel Speaks Out

www.dailymail.co.uk

MARTIN SAMUEL: All Liverpool was not be Man United... but they failed

MARTIN SAMUEL - CHIEF SPORTS WRITER: There are great and good people at Liverpool, but the modern reputation it has carefully cultivated went down with the ship Big Picture.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

A sycophantic media that has fawned over Pool and ignored / minimised their many failings on and off the pitch over decades has at long last recognised what every football fan knows about them.

Thankfully the leaching of the game by the American owners has been exposed. An unholy alliance of Americans and their paid cohorts planted in England and within UEFA, have plotted and connived against those investing in the game, their club and their community.

The Americans business plans are about extracting the most from our game and restricting competition for their benefit.

Now watch Neil Ashton`s continuing PR spin for all things Utd, and similar from their strangest of bedfellows at the other end of the M62.

Meanwhile Samuel speak outs and remains a voice of reason.
Click to expand...

A pleasure to read that.
 
TheThirdDeano said:
You’re absolutely right, I have a bias against the media, I worked in it for a while, I saw what it did.
I do not forget what I learnt there and I see it now in practice, despicable tools of propaganda and mass manipulation.

I was going to say, show me a newspaper without vested interest or an agenda and I’ll defend them for publish; but that’s not what the news is for: it’s for printing sheer fact.

the day you disagree or agree with a news story is when the media is dead.
Click to expand...

No you misunderstand, I do ot think you are biased against the media.

The rest of your post I pretty much agree with, the only difference I suppose is where people see some unique bias against City I see the vast majority of the media prepared to behave disgracefully to everyone and anyone to get a few clicks whether it be, in a football context Sterling/Mason Greenwood/Ross Barclay even going back to David Beckham, before it became fashionable to like him, and honourable men like Graham Taylor and Bobby Robson etc.
Still believe there are a some good people within it though or have no evidence to suggest otherwise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top