Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
SanPellegrini said:
www.thesun.co.uk

Roma had more English players in starting XI vs Juve than Man City at Swindon

ROMA had more English players in their starting XI to face Juventus this weekend than Manchester City did at Swindon. Jose Mourinho’s men hosted Juve in Serie A on Sunday with three English s…
www.thesun.co.uk www.thesun.co.uk

What a joke of an article, “Roma had MORE English players in their most recent match than Man City did vs Swindon”

We have a fantastic stream of academy talents coming through, besides the fact we have several first team English internationals. Most of whom were out because of Covid

I know the standard of journalism generally these days is terrible, and I’m not one to cry agenda, but why always us?
Click to expand...
Can't believe what I've just read.

Well I can actually as they are full of shit the sun and they like sticking the boot in but that piece was ridiculous.

Joshua Jones give yourself a pat on the back, that is if you have a backbone though.
 
SanPellegrini said:
www.thesun.co.uk

Roma had more English players in starting XI vs Juve than Man City at Swindon

ROMA had more English players in their starting XI to face Juventus this weekend than Manchester City did at Swindon. Jose Mourinho’s men hosted Juve in Serie A on Sunday with three English s…
www.thesun.co.uk www.thesun.co.uk

What a joke of an article, “Roma had MORE English players in their most recent match than Man City did vs Swindon”

We have a fantastic stream of academy talents coming through, besides the fact we have several first team English internationals. Most of whom were out because of Covid

I know the standard of journalism generally these days is terrible, and I’m not one to cry agenda, but why always us?
Click to expand...
It would have been more relevant to point out that Roma are shit and lying 7th with PEG inching ever closer towards the sack with each bad result. They're the Italian rags.
 
Re today’s Daily Mail Story that the EFL have inexplicably decided not to look into not the curious case of Liverpool’s false positives, and their apparent need to cancel their fixture with Arsenal as a result:


There is seemingly more chance of two people both randomly selecting the same star in our galaxy than Liverpool’s account of events being feasible (i.e. 40 or so lateral flow tests showing falsely positive).

For those false positives to then (again, unluckily) be confirmed by 40 PCR tests as also falsely positive, those two same people playing this game could now make things a little more interesting - and choose their individual stars from any of the other half billion galaxies too.

It has been recommended that people didn’t take a PCR for three months after an initially confirmed positive Covid test, as PCRs are capable of detecting the presence of the tiniest amount of virus 90 days after the infection has (to all intents and purposes) passed.

Yet, within a matter of hours or days (Liverpool have not, as yet, said how long after to my knowledge) the highly sensitive PCR testing conducted in round three (39 out of 40) showed the Liverpool staff and players to be utterly clear of even minuscule traces of virus.

And, er, we’re the conspiracists here apparently?

Nothing to see Mr Parry, as you were.
 
SilvaisSkyBlue said:
Was watching something recently and Dublin was described as a manchester united legend! Anyhow here is the relevant appearances/goals for all his clubs.


Senior career*
YearsTeamApps(Gls)
1988Norwich City0(0)
1988–1992Cambridge United156(52)
1988→ Barnet (loan)1(0)
1992–1994Manchester United12(2)
1994–1998Coventry City145(61)
1998–2004Aston Villa155(48)
2002→ Millwall (loan)5(2)
2004–2006Leicester City58(5)
2006Celtic11(1)
2006–2008Norwich City70(12)
Total613(183)

Legend = 2 goals!

The BBC are fast descending to Daily Mail levels of click bait and utter fùcking nonsense. Guess that is what employing ex-united employees gets you at Media City!
Click to expand...
Interesting to note with a quick and easy bit of subtraction.
Dublin was a rags legend in 12 games he played for them but not a legend in the huge number of games 601 in total that he played for other teams which amounts to .5 of one per cent.
Hmmm I think I'll try that again. The games he played for the rags were .5 of one per cent of the games he played for the rest. Ie fuck all in comparison really.
 
Last edited:
Bonzo Nododo said:
Interesting to note with a quick and easy bit of subtraction.
Dublin was a rags legend in 12 games he played for them but not a legend in the huge number of games 601 in total that he played for other teams which amounts to .5 of one per cent.
I think.
Click to expand...
I think it's just shy of 2% (given that 1% of 600 = 6, and he played a few more than 600 games in total).

Still nowhere near enough to be afforded 'legend' status though ;-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.