Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
He could have handled things totally differently. He could have asked, in a non-confrontational fashion, for opinions from City fans who fell in that middle ground he tried - very badly - to specify. You could even argue that, as a professional writer, his inability to phrase his original tweet properly either shows him to be a poor communicator or a deliberate wum.

But having done what he did, he got an entirely predictable reaction, particularly when he was starting from the point of view that some of us are (in his words) 'militant cranks'. So, if that's what you think to start with, what exactly did he expect? There has to be a strong suspicion that this is what he wanted, so he could prove his point.

Once that all kicked off, he had no need to react. He could have got his DM's and written his piece, which might possibly have been a fair and interesting one (although he's not the most insightful writer and I got fed up of his inane waffling through his answers to questions on the 93:20 pod).

After all, not all City fans do think the same way and there will inevitably be many different shades of political opinion among a large fanbase like ours. We certainly see that when we highlight the LGBT Pride events the club puts on.

But I've seen him do this before, where he gets a rush of blood and tweets snide and sarcastic responses, usually the standard journalistic one of the "how dare you have a different opinion to me" variety. He should have been looking to build bridges with our fanbase after his utterly execrable performance over CAS but he deliberately set out to alienate many of us further. If his job does depend on building subscriber numbers among the fanbase he's supposed to be covering, as alleged in Private Eye, he should be starting to panic.
I listened to his podcast for the first time and I didn't realise the he was a match going red as little as ten years ago. The way he was reminiscing about fergie years made me want to twat him. You can be as professional as you want but that runs to deep to act impartial as a journo imo!
 
Haven’t seen to much of the sports media today - watching Ukraine but I can only assume the Human Rights zealots are writing extensively on Dirty Russian Oil Money, Abromovich, Chelsea and Human Rights abuses in Eastern Europe….
 
Haven’t seen to much of the sports media today - watching Ukraine but I can only assume the Human Rights zealots are writing extensively on Dirty Russian Oil Money, Abromovich, Chelsea and Human Rights abuses in Eastern Europe….
And clubs who have Aeroflot amongst their sponsors perhaps, alongside Saudi Telecom.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.