Not sure if already posted but this from a supposed City fan is disgraceful
He has been in London to long being the spurs reporter plus it’s good for his future prospects kicking city is what you do.
Not sure if already posted but this from a supposed City fan is disgraceful
Just watched two hours of harrowing news coverage. Once again, sorry but not remotely funny.You guessed right!
You’re entitled to your opinion.Just watched two hours of harrowing news coverage. Once again, sorry but not remotely funny.
Sarcasm is not for everyoneGuessing it was a joke.
I think the latter. The name Emirates is plastered all over many sports. Abu Dhabi has the Grand Prix and Golf, Dubai one of the first Emirates to start diversifying gets quietly richer with fingers in all sorts of pies including being a must go for footballers second homes, a travel hub with very expensive goods for the rich. Lots more going on in the Gulf area and yet Pitt-Brookes settles on the one thing that he can get tthe ignorant and gullible to bite onto. City. Its just malice.City are not owned by the UAE and never have been. Sheikh Mansour has a ceremonial role with no executive decision-making powers. City are owned by Sheikh Mansour, a Chineseconsortium, and US-based Silverlake. Our ownership model has been scrutinised by dozens of lawyers, scores of accountants, and Judges. Not even UEFA accused us of being "state owned." Jack Pitt-Brooke is either a moron or has a malicious motive.
Another example of the agenda against City and in favour of the "media darlings" would be the handball when Liverpool played Wolves. Liverpool handball on the halfway line, a punt upfield another handball and goal, one nil. Wolves scored a goal that was ruled out for offside, much like the Chelsea goal. Liverpool supporters claimed there was no handball just a brilliant piece of skill on the halfway line. More game changing decisions. There seems to be a pattern here? Funnily enough though this brilliant piece of skill was later edited out and only the punt upfield left in.What’s the difference between the West Ham equaliser two weeks ago and Rodri’s? There was hardly a comment on Dawson’s hand ball goal but we’re still discussing Saturday’s incident three days later, it’s agenda driven
View attachment 37573
All the media on the handball and absolutely nothing on this, he was not even carded, ref even gave the advantage to Dippers laughably but England on Var who is their pet and did not bring this awful tackle to the refs attention and who is suspiciously involved in the majority of their/own games in the last 6 weeks.
I don't know his motive but to link every foreign policy decision taken by the UAE to Manchester City is absurd. As many have explained on here Sheikh Mansour has very limited influence, if any, in UAE Goverment decisions. Sheikh Mansour has investments all over the world in all sorts of sectors. To try and link a picture of one of our players crying to our owner is just pathetic.I think the latter. The name Emirates is plastered all over many sports. Abu Dhabi has the Grand Prix and Golf, Dubai one of the first Emirates to start diversifying gets quietly richer with fingers in all sorts of pies including being a must go for footballers second homes, a travel hub with very expensive goods for the rich. Lots more going on in the Gulf area and yet Pitt-Brookes settles on the one thing that he can get tthe ignorant and gullible to bite onto. City. Its just malice.
Not sure if already posted but this from a supposed City fan is disgraceful