Media Thread - 2021/22

[dadnlad]

Ladyman creaming his pants. Just read his guff under the picture.

Completely reconstructing English football's most famous club stadium - the home of the Busby Babes and Sir Alex Ferguson's 1999 treble winners

the world cup must becoming then and the government footing the rebuild

 

[VOOMER]

I love the wiki edit option

Dan Roan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Biography[edit source]​

Daniel Roan was born on 31 December 1976 and was brought up in Northampton, England. Roan went to Wellingborough School. He matriculated at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge in 1995 to read Social and Political Sciences. He graduated with a second-class degree in 1998.[1]

In 2012, Roan was banned from all media activity involving Manchester City following an interview with Patrick Vieira, which had been originally arranged to promote Football Against Hunger, a charity Vieira was involved with. Vieira was quoted in the interview as stating that city rivals Manchester United receive favourable refereeing decisions when playing at home. Roan was accused of deliberately taking Vieira's comments out of context and engaging in 'leading and aggressive questioning'. Considered a lick spittle's slick spittle, his shiny phallus shaped head and nonce type behaviour, led Roan to being awarded both the Jimmy Saville touchy feely and The Gary Glitter International education awards in 2019. It is felt that only the COVID pandemic and his subsequent incarceration for as one doctor put "Looking like and acting like a mucus discharge from gestating bull frog", stopped him from repeating the double in, 2020 and 2021. He remains on Interpol's top ten most wanted purple helmets. [2]

In 2018, Roan faced calls to resign following his comments at the memorial for Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha and four other victims of a fatal helicopter crash. Roan alleged that the Leicester City's boss had a 'mistress who died in the crash'.[3] Following, Roan issued an apology to explain that the comments were made off-air and with 'no offence intended'.[4]

 

[Aba452]

Where's the thread from the bbc sport chap who wanted some fan previews of the Saints cup game?

The replies I saw all told him to do one. If he wondered why, he should look to the charlatans he works with, and the biased skewed and racist reporting the eminates from their sports editor. The corporation's coverage of the Ukraine war has been praised by some, though there's still a huge amount of sensationalism, imo. But they're proud of their news coverage and defend it to the hilt.

Does the sports department have no accountability for its facile output? When a poster said there was no coverage of the palace game tonight, like an idiot, I looked. If you click on either of the teams for tonight's kick off, the preview does come up. But no other articles for the defending champions, in the context of a currently tight title race?

If you think I and many others on here are imagining things, do you really think a rags or dippers game would have so little build-up?

Hope the whole bunch of red shirt apologists are still traumatized by yet another demolition derby by the boys in blue.


Load of celery labias!

 

[Inter Me Nan]

Where's the thread from the bbc sport chap who wanted some fan previews of the Saints cup game?

The replies I saw all told him to do one. If he wondered why, he should look to the charlatans he works with, and the biased skewed and racist reporting the eminates from their sports editor. The corporation's coverage of the Ukraine war has been praised by some, though there's still a huge amount of sensationalism, imo. But they're proud of their news coverage and defend it to the hilt.

Does the sports department have no accountability for its facile output? When a poster said there was no coverage of the palace game tonight, like an idiot, I looked. If you click on either of the teams for tonight's kick off, the preview does come up. But no other articles for the defending champions, in the context of a currently tight title race?

If you think I and many others on here are imagining things, do you really think a rags or dippers game would have so little build-up?

Hope the whole bunch of red shirt apologists are still traumatized by yet another demolition derby by the boys in blue.


Load of celery labias!

Love it when you get angry.

 

[dickie davies]

I'm sure txiki would never sign a senior player unless Pep okayed it.

I miss Kyle.

Looks that way,

Where's the thread from the bbc sport chap who wanted some fan previews of the Saints cup game?

The replies I saw all told him to do one. If he wondered why, he should look to the charlatans he works with, and the biased skewed and racist reporting the eminates from their sports editor. The corporation's coverage of the Ukraine war has been praised by some, though there's still a huge amount of sensationalism, imo. But they're proud of their news coverage and defend it to the hilt.

Does the sports department have no accountability for its facile output? When a poster said there was no coverage of the palace game tonight, like an idiot, I looked. If you click on either of the teams for tonight's kick off, the preview does come up. But no other articles for the defending champions, in the context of a currently tight title race?

If you think I and many others on here are imagining things, do you really think a rags or dippers game would have so little build-up?

Hope the whole bunch of red shirt apologists are still traumatized by yet another demolition derby by the boys in blue.


Load of celery labias!

I think we can blame @Chris in London , who did a Vinny Jones and jumped in with a two footed lunge without giving Kyle a few slaps before the ultimate

 

[peter.evans]

Where's the thread from the bbc sport chap who wanted some fan previews of the Saints cup game?

The replies I saw all told him to do one. If he wondered why, he should look to the charlatans he works with, and the biased skewed and racist reporting the eminates from their sports editor. The corporation's coverage of the Ukraine war has been praised by some, though there's still a huge amount of sensationalism, imo. But they're proud of their news coverage and defend it to the hilt.

Does the sports department have no accountability for its facile output? When a poster said there was no coverage of the palace game tonight, like an idiot, I looked. If you click on either of the teams for tonight's kick off, the preview does come up. But no other articles for the defending champions, in the context of a currently tight title race?

If you think I and many others on here are imagining things, do you really think a rags or dippers game would have so little build-up?

Hope the whole bunch of red shirt apologists are still traumatized by yet another demolition derby by the boys in blue.


Load of celery labias!

Sky sports wereleading with rags game tomorrow night as main headline this afternoon.Presenter said " thoughts now turn to the champions league "! Er, not our thoughts Vicky. The champions ard focused on tonight's game !

 

[Aba452]

They are just such a load of transparent shits, but then again, what features do we ever see on Norwich or Saints, Watford, Wolves etc?

If they ignore us, maybe we'll go away!

 

[Shaggy]

They will never recover if they go down. What a crock of shit that deal was.

Don't forget that gushing rim job interview that Burnley's new owners are ok that was on Football Focus by that Radio 1 dj and Barnsley fan, Dave Ballsack Wart, or whatever the fuck his name is. Dopey little twonk.

Deal like United's, cept there is no way Burnely can hanle that.

 

[plattlanebenches]

Fuck off rat boy you ****!!!!

 

[Chris in London]

I think we can blame @Chris in London , who did a Vinny Jones and jumped in with a two footed lunge without giving Kyle a few slaps before the ultimate

Has that bastard Davies Moustache been nicking my login again?