Media Thread - 2021/22

[SatOnTheWall]

They put it about that Rabin is a paid shill, in cahoots with City. This makes no sense at all. City are non-litigious and just let the crap roll off their back. Why would they then pay someone like Rabin to point out the flaws in what they write? The journos just accuse him to excuse their own lies and justify the idea that City fans have been weaponised against the press.

The fact that they jumped straight to “paid shill” without even considering “fan sticking up for his club“ says a lot about them.

 

[ballbag]

Yet another one. Guess who's picture accompanies the article? No prizes as the answer is too obvious.

OLIVER HOLT: Greedy owners have insulted us for too long and we can't trust them any more... money-driven Premier League executives don't get it so it is time for an independent regulator​

Similar lines to this

 

[Blue Til Death]

I think nick should be congratulated for some excellent journalism. Bound to win loads of awards

I think he should be water boarded under Victoria Falls.. Just for a bit, until he starts telling the truth like…!!

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

Uefa proposes new spending rules to replace Financial Fair Play

Proposed new spending rules to replace Uefa's current Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations would limit club spending on wages, transfers and agents' fees to 70% of their revenue from 2025.

www.bbc.co.uk

it never fucking end. That weasel Simon Stone manages to shoe horn “artificial and state funding and Manchester City” funny the **** spends so much time brown nosing at Old Trafford you would think he knows all about the state funded Saudi Telecom deal that’s been worth hundreds of millions over the past dozen years. Twat.

He also quotes Tebas attacking City and PSG for being "state-funded" without the context of his background. It is totally dishonest to quote him without pointing out that he is a self-confessed far right supporter who wants Muslims deported from Spain(he has openly stated this) and also has strong links with Real Madrid who have had more state funding than most clubs in Europe. This really is disgusting stuff from the BBC and can't be defended by any public service organisation. It would be like quoting Gary Glitter's view on childcare without mentioning his background.

 

[jim tolmies perm]

The fact that they jumped straight to “paid shill” without even considering “fan sticking up for his club“ says a lot about them.

THEY call Rabin a paid shill? Oh the fucking irony
Self awareness has never been their strong point has it though....

 

[Sky Blue Thinking]

It seems to me that UEFA just don’t want Middle East owned clubs to be successful.

They also want to keep certain clubs involved in their flagship competition. Sixth place could get a CL place, but only for certain clubs? Are they for real? Fucking farcical.

It‘s all bullshit, they may as well just have their own little cartel history clubs playing each other in a league by invite only.

Unless the fans of one club dont fancy playing the other so break in the stadium and get the game postponed.

 

[bluealf]

They put it about that Rabin is a paid shill, in cahoots with City. This makes no sense at all. City are non-litigious and just let the crap roll off their back. Why would they then pay someone like Rabin to point out the flaws in what they write? The journos just accuse him to excuse their own lies and justify the idea that City fans have been weaponised against the press.

Indeed, the way they went after him must have been close to breaking legal boundaries.

 

[Claytop]

Nick Harris was the one who tried to expose Rabin right?

 

[Fred_Quimby]

He also quotes Tebas attacking City and PSG for being "state-funded" without the context of his background. It is totally dishonest to quote him without pointing out that he is a self-confessed far right supporter who wants Muslims deported from Spain(he has openly stated this) and also his strong links with Real Madrid who have had more state funding than most clubs in Europe. This really is disgusting stuff from the BBC and can't be defended by any public service organisation. It would be like quoting Gary Glitter's view on childcare without mentioning his background.

Simon Stone inferring that we are ‘state owned; like PSG and Manchester City.’ Disgraceful reporting yet again by BBC.

 

[The perfect fumble]

THEY call Rabin a paid shill? Oh the fucking irony
Self awareness has never been their strong point has it though....

It's dead simple really, these valiant journalists are bravely peeling away the layers of deceit and malfeasance to expose City's lies, their only mission is to enlighten their ignorant readers. Despite unwarranted brickbats they painstakingly root out evil wherever they find it! Without fear or favour. Theirs is a noble profession, yet these crusaders of light are paid a pittance in their unrelenting quest for the truth!

Rabin on the other hand is paid oodles of blood soaked oil money and lives next door to Phil Foden.