I see those cuddly Islamic guards from Iran, bombed five sites in Saudi last week.No, Sportswashing is so last year, it is now profit. He is bleeding us dry to fund his illegal invasion of Yemen.
I see those cuddly Islamic guards from Iran, bombed five sites in Saudi last week.No, Sportswashing is so last year, it is now profit. He is bleeding us dry to fund his illegal invasion of Yemen.
They are hoping for legislation to impose the regulator.It’s clear an ‘independent regulator’ is in the works. What I don’t understand, is how they can get one in place when the clubs who own the Premier League & will need to vote on it in order for it to happen, are all opposed?
Lastly, if Harris et al think a regulator is going to come on board and simply remove football owners they don’t like, and their business models, they are going to be deeply disappointed.
Stefan :) ;)
Shares won't be sold to facilitate 50+1. A golden share is the more likely route. "Ownership" is a misnomer, the fan owners have a very limited brief, mainly about legacy matters.They never say how we will get 50+1 either. Newcastle, the last club to be sold cost 300 million. 51% of that is 151 (ish) mill. How do normal Geordies find that kind of money plus....
Who is going to then stump up the rest and then be a minority owner. Can you imagine the problems buying Haaland. 51% of the club want him but 25% are only willing to pay him 100k per week, 25% will pay him any amount and 1% were on holiday and forgot to do a postal vote.
Probably the only way it happens, but in any event, any legislation would be to address things moving forward not retrospectively.They are hoping for legislation to impose the regulator.
Would they really start with a deduction? Sweet. Probably won't go down though. Pity.I'm sure Nick will pull that piece of analysis out and give it the depth of exploration it deserves.......
People forget, if they get relegated back to the EFL they start with a points deduction as they breached FFP to go up.....