Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
 
Silvercloud said:
The woman stood directly next to Logan never stopped looking directly at the camera. The Mrs pointed it out to me. Really strange, looking directly at the camera whenever the other pundits were talking.
Click to expand...
Even though someone else was holding the camera she probably thought it still qualifies as a selfie
 
Spurs quarter 69 said:
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
Click to expand...
They swallowed the FC Tribute Act kool aid from the start, worse than David Conn
 
airfrance7 said:
What was said?
Click to expand...
The gabby Logan Instagram, was fine, except the context of it all changed completely with the use of the word ‘but’.

it became:
‘sadly the first WSL live match on the BBC saw plucky Everton finish 0-4 to free spending City.’

The live commentary was incredibly biased.
City play well - ‘you’d expect that from them’ in deprecating tones.
Everton fluff the odd chance -‘very unlucky for Everton, they almost got back in the game, can they push on’ - in buoyant tones.

The ex Everton keeper co-commentator, I could understand being biased, and she at least did freely admit it. but surely either have a ex City co-commentator as well (or at least a pundit), or are we into the realms of 30 years of the PL co-commentary where the City flag is never waved From game 1.
 
Silvercloud said:
The woman stood directly next to Logan never stopped looking directly at the camera. The Mrs pointed it out to me. Really strange, looking directly at the camera whenever the other pundits were talking.
Click to expand...
That was the rag. Probably trained by their PR team to do that.
 
Spurs quarter 69 said:
Been a avid reader of WSC since the nineties, never been a Utd wank mag so was disappointed to find the current addition having a sly dig about FFP. Spoke of us being "lawyered up" to fight allegations of high sponsorship payments. They would be better employed campaigning against FFP for the ludicrous thing it is, encouraging debt and stopping investment. Without the investment at City and Chelsea we would have one team domination like Germany or a cosy duopoly like Scotland . Shame on you WSC !
Click to expand...
Lawyered up? I suppose they think we should just send staff from the ticket office to represent the club. We all know red top domination is what they really want and they resent having to report on City games in the knock out rounds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.