eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
The media bemoaning the fact we can bring on 60M Mahrez whilst ignoring Liverpool replacing 45M Jota with 60M Diaz? Either brain dead or agenda driven?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Wonder if the media ‘wonderful game’ narrative would have been different had the 5 big decisions gone City’s way instead of the bin dippers?
Just heard Danny Murphy on Talksport (I actually don't mind him compared to some)
apparently Liverpool only buy 30 to 40 million players and turn them into world class players.......They must have got Van Dyke and Alisson on frees then :).....fits the narrative though !
apparently Liverpool only buy 30 to 40 million players and turn them into world class players.......They must have got Van Dyke and Alisson on frees then :).....fits the narrative though !
crazyg
Well-Known Member
So does Joe 90.He can't be thick, he wears clever looking specs
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Wish I could be confident that Stones would do the same thing in the same situation......Murphy, “Van Dyke brings down KDB was the right thing to do”.
They are full of shit and it's been relentless all day.Just heard Danny Murphy on Talksport (I actually don't mind him compared to some)
apparently Liverpool only buy 30 to 40 million players and turn them into world class players.......They must have got Van Dyke and Alisson on frees then :).....fits the narrative though !
One things for sure, the media have done a world class job convincing people VAR's offsides are 100% factual, without explaining at all how that's true.
Do they have a computer program that automatically detects where the point of an arm that can be used to touch the ball is? As I'd love to know what that program looks like, or even a scientifically 100% accurate diagram of where that line on your arm is. It looks like some bloke just randomly decides to draw lines on a pitch, you even see them moving it manually ffs.
That's before you even get to the obviously not accurate "which frame to use", which we all know isn't perfect.
Yet despite this, the media love to throw out the "offside is offside, there is no debate" line again and again. Weirdly these things seem to always favour one side, probably a massive coincidence though
Do they have a computer program that automatically detects where the point of an arm that can be used to touch the ball is? As I'd love to know what that program looks like, or even a scientifically 100% accurate diagram of where that line on your arm is. It looks like some bloke just randomly decides to draw lines on a pitch, you even see them moving it manually ffs.
That's before you even get to the obviously not accurate "which frame to use", which we all know isn't perfect.
Yet despite this, the media love to throw out the "offside is offside, there is no debate" line again and again. Weirdly these things seem to always favour one side, probably a massive coincidence though
Newquayblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 793
I think it would be more fair to make it so there must be a gap between forward and defender - not able to discern whether there's a gap should be classed 'on side' - much better for the game imo.
The media bemoaning the fact we can bring on 60M Mahrez whilst ignoring Liverpool replacing 45M Jota with 60M Diaz? Either brain dead or agenda driven?
Diaz was reported at 37m which was a snip.
The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 24,342
Simon “the expert on everything” Jordan, on TalkSPORT this morning commenting on the lack of real rivalry between City and Liverpool, stated “City fans just aren’t engaged”.
Just like his brain.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.